The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 were read on this motion to/for DISSOLUTION. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Upon the foregoing documents and for the reasons set forth on the record (tr. 5.14.24), the motion (Mtn. Seq. No. 001) is granted solely to the extent that Gad Ruham (Respondent) shall make the books and records of the company available to Daniel Hoday (Petitioner), and the cross-motion to dismiss is denied. The allegations may support a derivative action but not one for dissolution (In re 1545 Ocean Ave., LLC, 72 AD3d 121, 132 [2d Dept 2010]). The facts in this case between Petitioner and Respondent are relatively straightforward. This case involves Hoham 932 Grand Street LLC (the LLC), a New York limited liability company, which has two fifty-percent members, the Respondent and the Petitioner. There are others. In fact — there are apparently eight other cases involving the Petitioner and the Respondent. As relevant, in this lawsuit, the parties agree that LLC was formed by the filing of articles of organization on November 21, 2000 (the Articles; NYSCEF Doc. No. 21). Significantly, the Articles provide only that “[t]he limited liability company is to be managed by 1 or more members” (id., 6). The Articles do not address which member would manage it, and the LLC has no operating agreement. The LLC has only one asset, a property located at 942 Grand Street in Brooklyn, New York (the Property; NYSCEF Doc. No. 1,