OPINION & ORDER Jamie Orsini and Nicholas Orsini (“Defendants”) stand charged in a two-count indictment for (i) committing a carjacking resulting in death in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§2119(3) and 2; and (ii) participating in a conspiracy to commit a carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §371. (Doc. 38). Before the Court is Defendant Jamie Orsini’s motion to sever her case from Defendant Nicholas Orsini under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 14. Defendant Jamie Orsini filed the motion to sever, pursuant to the briefing schedule directed by the Court, on April 15, 2024. (Doc. 50, “Def. Br.”). Defendant Nicholas Orsini filed a letter on May 6, 2024 stating that he would have “no objection” if the Court “were to issue an Order granting Mrs. Orsini a separate trial that preceded the trial of Mr. Orsini.” (Doc. 52). The government filed its opposition to the motion to sever on May 13, 2023. (Doc. 58, “Gov. Br.”). The government also submitted, via an email to chambers, two exhibits related to its opposition: a March 8, 2024 letter from the government to defense counsel regarding the production of jail calls and a September 6, 2023 letter from the government to defense counsel regarding the production of certain discovery. The Court heard oral argument from the parties on June 18, 2024. (Jun. 18, 2024 Minute Entry). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Jamie Orsini’s motion to sever is DENIED. BACKGROUND I. Allegations Against Defendants The government alleges that Defendants, on April 28, 2020, murdered Steven Kraft — Mrs. Orsini’s ex-husband and the father of two of her children — after Mr. Kraft dropped off those children at Defendants’ residence. (Doc. 2, “Compl.”). The government alleges that the scheme to murder Mr. Kraft required both members to play vital roles in its preparation and cover-up. (Id.). For example, two days before the murder, Mrs. Orsini allegedly purchased some of the items that she and her husband would need to carry out their grisly plan — a large tarp, duct tape, a coverall suit, and boots. (Id. 7(a)). Defendants also allegedly drove together on at least one “dry run” of the route that Mr. Orsini would later take to dispose of Mr. Kraft’s car. (Id. at
6(a), 7(c)). The government alleges that on the day of the murder, Defendants killed Mr. Kraft and disposed of his car — which was parked at the Defendants’ residence — using the same route that they had plotted days before. (Id. at
