X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Phillip Battease, Ogdensburg, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Victor Paladino of counsel), for respondents. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner, an incarcerated individual, was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order, failing to maintain the cleanliness and orderliness of his living quarters and creating a disturbance. According to the misbehavior report, a correction officer, while making rounds, ordered petitioner to clean his cubicle, which was not in compliance with facility rules. While in the presence of 49 other incarcerated individuals, petitioner responded that he did not have to clean his cubicle at that time, which prompted the correction officer to give another direct order to petitioner to clean his cubicle. Approximately 30 minutes later, another correction officer observed petitioner’s cubicle not in compliance. Following a tier II prison disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges. Upon administrative review, the determination was affirmed, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Initially, respondents concede, and our review of the record confirms, that the part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of creating a disturbance is not supported by substantial evidence and must be annulled. Because the penalty has been served and there was no loss of good time imposed, remittal of the matter for a redetermination of the penalty on the remaining charges is not required (see Matter of MacKenzie v. Tedford, 208 AD3d 1526, 1527 [3d Dept 2022]). As for the remaining charges, we find that the misbehavior report and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support that part of the determination finding petitioner guilty of refusing a direct order and failing to maintain the cleanliness and orderliness of his living quarters (see Matter of Boddie v. Selsky, 18 AD3d 996, 997 [3d Dept 2005]; 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [19] [viii]). Petitioner’s alternative narrative of the incident created a credibility determination for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see e.g. Matter of Farley v. Annucci, 224 AD3d 969, 971 [3d Dept 2024]). Even assuming that the misbehavior report did not comply with the requirements of 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 (b) because it was not endorsed by a staff member who had personal knowledge of the facts providing the basis for the report, “petitioner has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the omission, inasmuch as these individuals testified at the hearing” (Matter of Barzee v. Venettozzi, 173 AD3d 1580, 1580 [3d Dept 2019]). To the extent that petitioner challenges that portion of the penalty resulting in the confiscation of certain clothing items for the imposed penalty of 30 days, this challenge is moot, as the duration of the penalty has expired (see Matter of Dagnone v. Annucci, 149 AD3d 1461, 1462 [3d Dept 2017]). Petitioner’s assertion that his personal property has not been returned to him is a matter more appropriately pursued in the context of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision grievance procedure (see Matter of Morrison v. Fischer, 110 AD3d 1421, 1422 [3d Dept 2013]; Matter of Johnson v. Department of Correctional Servs., 53 AD3d 746, 747 [3d Dept 2008]; see generally 7 NYCRR 701.2 [a]). Petitioner’s remaining arguments, to the extent not specifically addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit. Garry, P.J., Clark, Aarons, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur. ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of creating a disturbance; petition granted to that extent and respondent Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility is directed to expunge all references to that charge from petitioner’s institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
September 12, 2024
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.


Learn More

Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...


Apply Now ›

The Forest Preserves of Cook CountyIs seeking applicants forDeputy Chief Attorney The Forest Preserves of Cook County is seeking a detail-o...


Apply Now ›

PLEASE REVIEW THE ENTIRE POSTING TO ENSURE ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED. August 14, 2024 Notice of Job Vacancy #2024-05 An opp...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›