X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 were read on this motion to/for CONFIRM/DISAPPROVE AWARD/REPORT. DECISION, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT AKF, Inc., doing business as Fundkit e (AKF), petitions pursuant to CPL R 7510 to confirm an arbitration award dated November 21, 2023, made by an arbitrator acting under the auspices of the Mediation and Civil Arbitration, Inc. (MCA). The respondents do not oppose the petition. The petition is granted, the award is confirmed, and the Clerk of the court is directed to enter a money judgment in favor of AKF and against the respondents, jointly and severally, in the sum of $48,887.69, plus statutory interest from November 21, 2023. On June 1, 2023, AKF entered into an agreement with the respondent M & M General Store, LLC, doing business as M & M General Store (hereinafter M & M), pursuant to which AKF agreed to purchase $41,322.00 of M & M future receivables for the sum of $29,100.00, less service fees in the sum of $1,931.00, in consideration for M & M’s future repayment of that sum plus 10 percent in annual interest. The agreement presumed a weekly “delivery” amount of $1,475.79 from M & M’s receivables, via an automatic debit from M & M’s bank account, with a monthly reconciliation. The respondent Mogammed Ali Monawer Al-Qwaider guaranteed M & M’s obligations under the agreement. The agreement provided for arbitration of any dispute under the agreement, including claims that M & M breached the agreement by failing to pay its weekly delivery. AKF alleged in its petition that, on June 26, 2023, it received a notice from M & M’s bank that the scheduled weekly debit of receipts from the designated account was declined because “Payment [was] Stopped.” AKF further asserted that, as of the date of M & M’s default, M & M had paid only $2,951.58 of the $41,322.00 ultimately due under the agreement, leaving a balance of $38,370.42. AKF alleged that it believed that M & M’s principals began “diverting” M & M’s receipts into other accounts. On August 1, 2023, AKF served the respondents with a demand for arbitration of its claim for $47,963.03 against them before MCA, doing business as Rapid Ruling, an arbitral forum with headquarters in New York, New York, and offices located in Manhasset, New York. The respondents failed to respond to the demand or appear at the arbitration hearing. In an award dated November 21, 2023, the arbitrator agreed with AKF’s contentions, and awarded AKF the principal sum of $38,370.42, plus liquidated default fees in the sum of $9,592.61, along with attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses in the sum of $924.66, inclusive of fees, costs and expenses that were incurred in “pursuing this [arbitration] proceeding and [an] ancillary court proceeding brought in anticipation of this arbitration,” as required by the agreement, for a total award of $48,887.69. Pursuant to CPLR 7510, the court “shall confirm an [arbitration] award upon application of a party made within one year after its delivery to him [or her] unless the award is vacated or modified upon a ground specified in section 7511.” Since the arbitration involved here is consensual, rather than compulsory, the award may only be vacated if the court finds that the rights of a party were prejudiced by: “(i) corruption, fraud or misconduct in procuring the award; or (ii) partiality of an arbitrator appointed as a neutral, except where the award was by confession; or (iii) an arbitrator, or agency or person making the award exceeded his power or so imperfectly executed it that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made; or (iv) failure to follow the procedure of this article, unless the party applying to vacate the award continued with the arbitration with notice of the defect and without objection” (CPLR 7511[b][1]). The grounds specified in CPLR 7511 for vacatur of an arbitration award are exclusive (see Bernstein Family Ltd. Partnership v. Sovereign Partners, L.P., 66 AD3d 1, 8 [1st Dept 2009]), and it is a “well-established rule that an arbitrator’s rulings, unlike a trial court’s, are largely unreviewable” (Matter of Falzone v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 15 NY3d 530, 534 [2013]). AKF petitioned to confirm the award on December 5, 2023 and, thus, its application was timely made. AKF contends that the award was proper in all respects and that no grounds exist for modification or vacatur. The court agrees with AKF, and concludes that AKF is entitled both to the confirmation of the award, and the entry of a money judgment in the sum of $48,887.69, as awarded by the arbitrator. The total award must bear interest from the date of the arbitration award, that is, from November 21, 2023 (see CPLR 5002; Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Niagara, Wheatfield, Lewiston & Cambria v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Assn., 46 NY2d 553, 558 [1979]; Dermigny v. Harper, 127 AD3d 685, 686 [2d Dept 2015]; Matter of Levin & Glasser, P.C. v. Kenmore Prop., LLC, 70 AD3d 443, 446 [1st Dept 2010]; Matter of Gruberg v. Cortell Group, Inc., 143 AD2d 39, 39 [1st Dept 1988]). Accordingly, it is, ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, and the arbitration award rendered in the matter entitled Matter of AKF, Inc. v. M & M General Store, LLC, etc., et ano., Mediation and Civil Arbitration, Inc., Case Number 44965/2023, dated November 21, 2023, be, and hereby is, confirmed; and it is further, ORDERED that the Clerk of the court shall enter a money judgment in favor of the petitioner, AKF, Inc., doing business as Fundkite, and against the respondents, M & M General Store, LLC, doing business as M & M General Store, and Mogammed Ali Monawer Al-Qwaider, jointly and severally, in the principal sum of $48,887.69, plus statutory prejudgment interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum thereon from November 21, 2023. This constitutes the Decision, Order, and Judgment of the court. CHECK ONE: X  CASE DISPOSED   NON-FINAL DISPOSITION X                GRANTED              DENIED  GRANTED IN PART       OTHER APPLICATION:   SETTLE ORDER    SUBMIT ORDER CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:                INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN     FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT REFERENCE Dated: September 20, 2024

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

Company Description Hyderally & Associates, P.C. is a law firm located in Montclair, NJ, specializing in all areas of employment law. T...


Apply Now ›

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a partner/counsel for their rapidly expandi...


Apply Now ›

Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a junior-mid level associate their rapidly ...


Apply Now ›