This column highlights recent noteworthy decisions of the United States District Court of the Northern District of New York with an emphasis on practice and procedure issues. In some key cases: Judge Lawrence E. Kahn declined supplemental jurisdiction due to unsettled state law; Magistrate David R. Homer interpreted the timeliness of motions made under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 59; and Senior Judge Howard G. Munson discussed the public’s right to access documents produced under a non-party subpoena.
Supplemental Jurisdiction
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
