I n Summerville v. City of New York, 2002 WL 432369 (March 19, 2002), the Court of Appeals held that a governmental appellant obtains a new automatic stay under CPLR 5519(a)(1) when it appeals or files a motion for leave to appeal from an adverse order of an intermediate appellate court, even though it allowed its original automatic stay to lapse by failing to serve and file as required by CPLR 5519(e) to continue that stay.
April 30, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In Summerville v. City of New York, 2002 WL 432369 (March 19, 2002), the Court of Appeals held that a governmental appellant obtains a new automatic stay under CPLR 5519(a)(1) when it appeals or files a motion for leave to appeal from an adverse order of an intermediate appellate court, even though it allowed its original automatic stay to lapse by failing to serve and file as required by CPLR 5519(e) to continue that stay.
Prior Case Law Overruled
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
