The FTC argued that the defendants violated the FTC Act and the Pay-Per-Call Rule . . . . In essence, the FTC asserted that the practices of the defendants were deceptive and designed to mislead consumers with respect to supposedly winning a prize,
A FEDERAL court in Nevada on April 16 granted a temporary restraining order in the case FTC v. BTV Industries, enjoining an apparent e-mail scam that offered free video-game consoles but instead routed people to a pornography Web site charging $3.99 per minute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
