ALBANY – In a ruling that potentially shifts the balance of power in a significant sector of the New York City housing market, the Court of Appeals yesterday held that cooperatives, condominiums and their shareholders can sue sponsors who fail to sell apartments within a reasonable period following conversion. The decision recognizes a cause of action for breach of contract, and could spark a spate of lawsuits by tenant-owners and co-op boards when sponsors are hoarding unsold apartments.

Plaintiffs’ counsel Beatrice Lesser, of Gallet Dreyer & Berkey LLP in Manhattan, said the ruling should end what has become a common sponsor practice of retaining rather than selling apartments. She said the ruling largely vests control in the owners rather than the sponsors who, even lacking a majority of votes on the board, were able to dictate building management practices. Until yesterday, it was unclear whether owners and co-op boards had any recourse.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]