N ALMOST EVERY patent infringement case, the patent owner alleges that the defendant has not only infringed its patent, but has done so “willfully,” or with wanton disregard of the patentee’s rights. A finding of willful infringement can result in a trebling of the patent owner’s compensatory damages and an award of attorney fees. The most common defense to a charge of willful infringement is that the accused infringer acted in good faith reliance on the competent opinion of patent counsel.
Seeking the advice of patent counsel is fundamental to the decision of whether to introduce a product or service into the market. Patent counsel is typically asked to advise on whether the client can proceed without infringing the valid patent of another. Often, patent counsel is charged with memorializing the advice in a written opinion on which the client can rely if accused of willful infringement. Complicating matters is that the attorney-client privilege may have to be waived and the opinion disclosed in order to establish good faith reliance on the advice should the client be charged with willful infringement in a litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
