Filter This View

  • USA v. Lawrence Dicristina, 11-CR-414

    Publication Date: 2012-08-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Jack B. Weinstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the government By: Marisa M. Seifan, Nathan Daniel Reilly, Office of the United States Attorney, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: For the defendant: Kannan Sundaram, Federal Defenders, Brooklyn, NY. For amicus curiae Poker Players Alliance By: Thomas C. Goldstein, Tejinder Singh, Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Kenneth M. Dreifach, ZwillGen, PLLC, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 11-CR-414

    Cite as: USA v. Lawrence Dicristina, 11-CR-414, NYLJ 1202568480608, at *1 (EDNY, Decided August 21, 2012)District Judge Jack B. Wei

  • Elite Licensing Inc. v. Thomas Plastics Inc.

    Publication Date: 2003-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Scheindlin ELITE LICENSING, INC. v. THOMAS PLASTICS, INC. — This is an action for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,813,569 (“the ‘569 Patent”) for a

  • Richard L. Brodsky, et al., Plaintiffs v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Defendant, 09 Civ. 10594 (LAP)

    Publication Date: 2011-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Loretta A. Preska
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Richard L. Brodsky, Esq. for himself and Susan Hillary Shapiro of the Law Firm of Milton B. Shapiro for other Parties.
    for defendant: For Defendants: Benjamin H. Torrance of the US Att'y's office, SDNY, for US NRC; Tracey Ann Tiska and Eva Lenore Dietz of Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. for Entergy.
    Case Number: 09 Civ. 10594 (LAP)

    Cite as: Richard L. Brodsky, et al. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 09 Civ. 10594 (LAP), NYLJ 1202485310027, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 4, 2011)

  • Portalatin v. Graham, 06 CV 5002

    Publication Date: 2007-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-03-22
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06 CV 5002

    Judge John Gleeson U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Joshua Michael Levine, Esq. Appellate Advocates New York, New York Atto

  • Casseus v. Verizon New York, Inc., 08-CV-4119

    Publication Date: 2010-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented by Justin H. Reilly and Neil H. Greenberg, Law Offices of Neil H. Greenberg & Associates
    for defendant: Defendant is represented by Martin Warren Aron of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP
    Case Number: 08-CV-4119

    District Judge Joseph F. BiancoDecided: July 09, 2010Plaintiff is represented by Justin H. Reilly and Neil H. Greenberg, Law O

  • Palmieri v. Lynch

    Publication Date: 2004-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit Judge Miner Appeal from summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Seybert

  • AMS, III, Petitioner v. EDG and PS, Respondents, Caseindex_

    Publication Date: 2012-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Family Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Judge Caren Loguercio
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Thomas Campagna, Esq.
    for defendant: For Respondent: Nancy Enoksen, Esq. For Co-Respondent: Natasha Meyer. For the Subject Child: Heather Fig, Esq.
    Case Number: Caseindex_

    Cite as: AMS, III v. EDG, Index number, NYLJ 1202556099286, at *1 (Fam., SUF, Decided May 12)Judge Caren LoguercioDecided: May

  • In Re UBS AG Securities, 07 Civ. 11225

    Publication Date: 2012-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Richard J. Sullivan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiffs are represented by Gregory M. Castaldo, Andrew L. Zivitz, Sharan Nirmul, Naumon A. Amjed, Jennifer L. Joost, and Richard A. Russo, Jr. of Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA. Jay W. Eisenhofer, Geoffrey C. Jarvis, Brenda F. Szydlo, and Charles T. Caliendo, of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., New York, NY. Joseph F. Rice, William H. Narwold, Gregg S. Levin, James M. Hughes, and Badge Humphries of Motley Rice LLC, and Samuel H. Rudman and Robert M. Rothman of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, NY. The UBS Defendants are represented by Robert J. Giuffra, Jr., Suhana S. Han, and Matthew A. Schwartz of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. The Underwriter Defendants are represented by Barry Robert Ostrager and Jonathan K. Youngwood of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07 Civ. 11225

    Cite as: In Re UBS AG Securities, 07 Civ. 11225, NYLJ 1202573246145, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 28, 2012)District Judge Richard J. Sullivanp clas

  • Jericho Group, Ltd and Jericho Co., Plaintiff v. Herzfeld & Rubin and Herbert Rubin, Defendants, 3642/11

    Publication Date: 2012-05-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Term, Part Comm-2
    Judge: Justice David I. Schmidt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff Attorney: Andrew Lavoott Bluestone.
    for defendant: Defendant Attorney: Herzfeld & Rubin
    Case Number: 3642/11

    Cite as: Jericho Group, Ltd v. Herzfeld & Rubin, 3642/11, NYLJ 1202555399892, at *1 (Sup., KI, Decided May 10, 2012)Justice David I. Schmidtp cla

  • Hatfill v. Foster

    Publication Date: 2005-11-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge McMahon The circumstances giving rise to this libel suit and its transfer to this Court are described more full