0 results for 'undefined'
Justice Alito's State of the Union Dissent
During the State of the Union address Wednesday night, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito visibly disagreed with President Barack Obama's remarks about the Citizens United v. FEC decision. Alito started shaking his head while Obama was talking about the Court reversing a "century of law" and in so doing will "open the floodgates" of corporate spending in campaigns. If it was the first part of the sentence Alito objected to, it could be argued that he has a point.Townsend Launches A New D.C. Office
San Francisco intellectual property firm Townsend & Townsend & Crew is carving out its spot on the East Coast by focusing - at least initially - on patent prosecution and patent litigation.Alito owned stock, voted in case with Disney's ABC
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito took part in a case over curse words on television involving ABC Inc. and other networks even though he owned stock in ABC's parent, Walt Disney Co., at the time.Alito said Tuesday that he owned around $2,000 in Disney stock when the court heard the case FCC v. Fox Television Stations in late 2008.Calif. Court Upholds $82.6 Mil. Judgment Against Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Co. took a big hit Monday when a California state appellate court stood by its own earlier decision to award $82.6 million in damages to a paraplegic who claimed faulty design caused her car to crash.Organizer of 'Club' Deriding Coworker Properly Fired, Panel Concludes
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition
Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN
View this Book
View more book results for the query "*"
DCJ Executive Director Announces Retirement
Janet Leban, executive director of the Delaware Center for Justice, announced to the staff and board of directors that she will be retiring at the end of the year.
Could Obama's Exec Salary Cap Cause More Problems Than It Solves?
President Barack Obama announced on Wednesday a $500,000 cap on senior executive pay for companies receiving substantial federal bailout money. Steven Friedman, chairman of the employee benefits practice group at San Francisco's Littler Mendelson, called the cap "unprecedented." He also said the move could discourage companies from seeking government bailouts while giving a recruiting advantage to competitors that do not receive federal funds. Friedman examines the implications of the cap.DOJ attempts to lead, but FTC declines to follow
In a recent report, the U.S. Department of Justice recognized a dilemma faced by the antitrust enforcement agencies and courts in applying � 2 of the Sherman Act is determining whether monopoly power has been acquired lawfully or unlawfully, and distinguishing competitively harmful conduct by a monopolist or aspiring monopolist that should be prohibited, from lawful, aggressive competition on the merits that should be encouraged. The standards set forth by the DOJ to promote clarity and transparency have stirred a vigorous debate about the extent to which the DOJ's pronouncements are a departure from existing � 2 jurisprudence. In this regard, the Federal Trade Commission, which shares authority with the DOJ for antitrust enforcement, refused to endorse the report.Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 5, No. 195 -- October 15, 1997
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
