Search Results

0 results for '*'

You can use to get even better search results

Augustin v. Augustin, 2678N

Publication Date: 2010-12-30

Practice Area: Family Law

Industry:

Court: Appellate Division, First Department

Judge: Before: Nardelli, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, Freedman, Roman, JJ.

Case number: 2678N

Cite as: Augustin v. Augustin, 2678N, NYLJ 1202476678385, at *1 (App. Div. 1st, Decided December 28, 2010)Before: Nardelli, J.P., McGuire, Acosta, Freedman, Rom

February 10, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Redskins Owner Sues Cadwalader Over Advice on Bank Fee in Proxy Fight

5 minute read

April 25, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Court of Appeals Reports Higher Caseload, More Criminal Leaves Granted in 2010

7 minute read

February 04, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Employment Law

Jeffrey S. Klein and Nicholas J. Pappas, partners at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, provide a general overview of the legal framework that courts have applied in deciding whether to deny enforcement of arbitration agreements under the law of unconscionability, and then analyze a recent California appellate court decision which denied enforcement of an arbitration agreement due to unconscionability, in part because of the inclusion of a class-action waiver clause.

15 minute read

March 18, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Financing

Jeffrey B. Steiner and Jason R. Goldstein, members of DLA Piper (US), write: Lenders seeking to enforce their loan documents must examine the circumstances leading to a borrower default carefully. While the principles of law suggest that all defaults are entitled to enforcement, given that foreclosure is an equitable remedy, lenders should consider the relative strength of their argument in light of possible borrower defenses. In many instances, lenders that wait for a 'clean' default will avoid the unnecessary delay caused by a borrower's argument for equitable relief.

11 minute read

Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

April 12, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Suit Over Insurer's Denial Of Coverage for Travel Emergency May Proceed

3 minute read

July 11, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Domestic Relations Law

Leonard G. Florescue, a partner at Blank Rome, writes: I have spent some considerable time reading and re-reading the Court of Appeals' decision in Keane v. Keane, but have to report that I cannot quite get it. I realize fully that the Court's word on this is the final one for now. However, I trust that another opportunity to re-examine this decision will arise and, when it does, I can, respectfully, hope that the Court of Appeals will find some use in it.

10 minute read

March 13, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Overcoming Limitations of Condo Boards in Dealing With Unruly Residents

Bruce A. Cholst and Mary L. Kosmark, partners at Rosen Livingston & Cholst, write that the concept of a forced buy back of residential units upon determination that the owner's occupancy is "objectionable" offers condo boards a potent option for addressing serious situations for which they are currently ill equipped.

11 minute read

July 15, 2013 | New York Law Journal

New Ruling Precludes Insurers From Contesting Indemnity Coverage

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman's Robin L. Cohen, Elizabeth A. Sherwin and Jack P. Winsbro write: Recognizing New York's long-standing protection of a policyholder's contractual right to a contemporaneous defense, the Court of Appeals recently enunciated a new rule of preclusion for an insurer that disclaims a defense obligation.

11 minute read