Sills Cummis & Gross Moves Up in Legal World With Strong 2018 Performance
The midmarket law firm has not yet broken into the Am Law 200 but that could change in the next few years if it continues its steady growth.
February 11, 2019 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
|
Riding the wave of a strong economy, midmarket law firm Sills Cummis & Gross has reported gross revenue of $90.2 million for the 2018 fiscal year, up from last year's figure of $87.9 million.
The firm has fallen short of making it to the Am Law 200 but if it continues its steady financial growth, it could win entry to the list in the next few years.
The firm also reported revenue per lawyer of $663,000 for fiscal year 2018 compared with $656,000 for a year earlier. Its profits per partner came to $885,000, up from $879,000 the previous year. The firm's head count grew slightly to 136 lawyers firmwide, including 63 partners, compared with 134 lawyers and 61 partners in fiscal 2017.
“It was a very successful year. I wish I could take all the credit, but the general state of the economy, the quality of our lawyers, and luck were all factors,” said Max Crane, the firm's managing partner.
Much of the firm's growth rests on its core practice areas of litigation, general corporate transactional work, real estate, and bankruptcy and restructuring, Crane said. Those practices and the bankruptcy practice, in particular, were in strong demand throughout the year.
The firm has income rather than equity partners and eschews lockstep compensation for its partners in favor of a highly entrepreneurial system that incentivizes the originators of business, Crane noted.
One step that Crane says undoubtedly helped grow business over the past year was the luring of James Tyrrell, a commercial litigator with a focus on toxic torts whose extensive resume includes practicing law at Latham & Watkins, Squire Patton Boggs, and Locke Lord. Highlights of Tyrrell's legal career include acting as lead counsel for New York City in the protracted litigation over the World Trade Center catastrophe and advising SEACOR in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
Indeed, the law firm's growth rests heavily on the luring of highly sought-after legal professionals such as Tyrrell rather than a sudden and massive expansion through tie-ups with competitors. Even as one midsized law firm after another gets swept up in the merger wave, Crane denies that Sills Cummis has been in merger talks in recent months.
“We have tried to grow incrementally and organically by bringing in lawyers by the ones and twos and in small groups, rather than looking for a 'home run' which might put our profitability at risk and our internal culture at risk. We do like to grow, but we're not looking for one swing of the bat to change our dynamic,” Crane stated.
Asked whether merger talks might be a possibility in the future if the right offer came along, Crane replied, “I never say never.”
In an age of unremitting pressure on rates, Sills Cummis has been open to alternative fee arrangements for some of its clients.
“We're really guided by the client. You have to be. If a client wants an alternative rate, we will take a look at it,” Crane said.
Crane considers the lawyers' fees at his firm to be a bargain for many clients given the alternative. If the clients went to one of the marquee names in the legal world, they could easily pay $1,200 an hour for a partner's services and $700 an hour for the help of a second-, third-, or fourth-year associate. At Sills Cummis, the latter rate can get clients the attention of a talented partner, Crane said.
Crane added that he expects the firm's deliberate, measured growth to continue through 2019 and beyond.
“We believe that life's a marathon, not a sprint. Slow and steady wins the race,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250