Another Law Firm Expires Along With Its New York Lease
After an 80-year run, partners at Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs opted to dissolve the firm last month.
November 13, 2017 at 05:28 PM
11 minute read
Like many other small firms in Manhattan, the end of a lease triggered the dissolution of Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs, a general services firm dating back to the mid-1930s.
Wormser Kiely had as many as 38 attorneys a few years ago and an office in White Plains. But that office closed in 2014, and the firm saw defections when its merger talks with larger firms in the last few years did not come to fruition, said former Wormser Kiely managing partner Charles Banino.
Ultimately, 22 attorneys remained at the firm's East Midtown offices before the partnership disbanded in the last month to at least seven law firms: Greenspoon Marder; Condon & Forsyth; Kauff McGuire & Margolis; Warshaw Burstein; Eaton & Van Winkle; Phillips Nizer; and CKR Law.
“The lease was the primary driver” for the dissolution, Banino said. “People look at various relationships and opportunities, and when a lease expiration is staring at you in the face, you make the best decision for yourself, and more importantly, for your clients.”
Wormser Kiely is one of several small New York firms to fold in recent years when confronted with a lease expiration. Others triggered at least in part by lease terms include Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard; Hofheimer Gartlir & Gross; and Morgenthau & Greenes.
New York law firm consultant J. Mark Santiago, speaking generally on the legal market, said surviving a lease expiration is a “large hurdle” for a small firm, especially in the last five years in Manhattan, where more and more landlords are demanding personal guarantees from partners in new leases.
Lease renewal and new leases “are one of the major reasons for small firm disintegration,” he said, “because it makes partners take a hard look at their firm's financial stability and long-term prospects.”
Banino, the former leader of Wormser Kiely, said its dissolution was “not for economic reasons,” noting that “last year's revenue was probably stronger than any other year in recent memory.” Banino declined to disclose firm revenue or partner profits.
With its lease expiring in early 2019 at 825 Third Ave., the firm could not renew, as the landlord, the Durst Organization, is seeking to redevelop the office tower, said Banino. “Every tenant has to leave,” he said.
Meanwhile, the partners had “different interests” and different opportunities with other firms, and some attorneys in their late 60s and early 70s didn't want to sign a long-term lease, he said.
Wormser Kiely was a product of the 1989 merger of two law firms that both dated to the mid-1930s, and it was composed of transactional, corporate governance, litigation and trusts and estate practices. It was also known for having a strong immigration practice.
The largest portion of the Wormser Kiely firm—10 attorneys in transactional, real estate, banking, trust and estate, litigation, and commercial law—landed at Condon & Forsyth, a 50-attorney firm in New York, Los Angeles and Miami.
The second-largest group, five attorneys who made up the bulk of Wormser Kiely's immigration practice, moved to labor and employment firm Kauff McGuire & Margolis, creating a new immigration practice there.
The group represents several international law firms for corporate immigration needs such as obtaining work visas and resident status for their employees. The lawyers also represent clients in other industries, such as entertainment and production, beverage, publishing, financial services and engineering industries, said Donald Wolfson, a former Wormser Kiely attorney who headed the group joining Kauff McGuire. Other attorneys coming from the firm include Andrew Lerner, Michael Mandel, Gayle Oshrin and Joseph Yoo.
“It was a harmonious, nonacrimonious dissolution,” Wolfson said. “We were together for a long, long time, and it was a very good vibrant partnership.”
Like many other small firms in Manhattan, the end of a lease triggered the dissolution of
Ultimately, 22 attorneys remained at the firm's East Midtown offices before the partnership disbanded in the last month to at least seven law firms:
“The lease was the primary driver” for the dissolution, Banino said. “People look at various relationships and opportunities, and when a lease expiration is staring at you in the face, you make the best decision for yourself, and more importantly, for your clients.”
Lease renewal and new leases “are one of the major reasons for small firm disintegration,” he said, “because it makes partners take a hard look at their firm's financial stability and long-term prospects.”
Banino, the former leader of
With its lease expiring in early 2019 at 825 Third Ave., the firm could not renew, as the landlord, the Durst Organization, is seeking to redevelop the office tower, said Banino. “Every tenant has to leave,” he said.
Meanwhile, the partners had “different interests” and different opportunities with other firms, and some attorneys in their late 60s and early 70s didn't want to sign a long-term lease, he said.
The largest portion of the
The second-largest group, five attorneys who made up the bulk of
The group represents several international law firms for corporate immigration needs such as obtaining work visas and resident status for their employees. The lawyers also represent clients in other industries, such as entertainment and production, beverage, publishing, financial services and engineering industries, said Donald Wolfson, a former
“It was a harmonious, nonacrimonious dissolution,” Wolfson said. “We were together for a long, long time, and it was a very good vibrant partnership.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250