Western NY Attorney and Political Operative Set to Plead Guilty on Federal Charges of Bribing Judge
Pigeon was accused by state and federal prosecutors of offering bribes to former state Supreme Court Justice John Michalek for more than three years in exchange for influence over litigation before the court.
October 02, 2018 at 01:14 PM
4 minute read
Steven Pigeon, an attorney and political operative from Western New York, will plead guilty to federal charges of bribing a judge two weeks after he pleaded guilty to state charges in the same scheme.
Filings in the Western District of New York show Pigeon intends to change his plea in federal court before U.S. District Judge Richard Arcara on Oct. 9. He previously pleaded not guilty to the charges.
A spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney James Kennedy of the Western District of New York declined to confirm or comment on the change in plea. Paul Cambria Jr. of Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria, who represents Pigeon, did not respond to a request for comment.
Pigeon was accused by state and federal prosecutors of offering bribes to former state Supreme Court Justice John Michalek for more than three years in exchange for influence over litigation before the court.
Michalek pleaded guilty to the scheme in 2016 and subsequently resigned from the bench. He had held the post for almost two decades. He was also disbarred.
Pigeon already lost his law license when he pleaded guilty to a state felony charge of bribery last week in the arrangement. He previously worked in Buffalo for the Rochester-based firm Underberg & Kessler.
Pigeon is known less for his work as an attorney and more for his influence in political circles, particularly in Western New York. He was chair of the Erie County Democratic Committee for nearly a decade and has close ties to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. He was known as a powerhouse among Democrats in Western New York but also had statewide influence in the party.
That changed in 2016 when former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman indicted him on the state charges of bribing Michalek. The federal indictment followed in 2017.
The federal charges cover bribes offered to Michalek by Pigeon between February 2012 and April 2013. Pigeon agreed to support Michalek's application to be appointed to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, according to his federal indictment. Those appointments are made by the governor and approved by the state Senate. The same agreement was alleged by state prosecutors in their indictment.
Pigeon also promised to get a member of Michalek's family a job working on President Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign and offered to help the same individual get a job with the U.S. Department of State, according to the federal indictment.
Those efforts were in exchange for favorable judicial decisions from Michalek and to control who he would appoint to a paid court receivership, federal prosecutors said.
The change in plea comes just days before attorneys were scheduled for oral arguments before Arcara on pretrial motions, which included a motion to dismiss certain charges against Pigeon and suppress some of his statements from trial. A sealed document was filed in the case last week before his guilty plea on state charges.
The guilty plea next week will put to bed Pigeon's legal problems related to the scheme, at least for now. He's scheduled to be sentenced on the state charges in December.
Attorney General Barbara Underwood's office had used emails and text messages between Pigeon and Michalek to allege the bribery scheme in 2016. They were set to go to trial in the case this month before Pigeon agreed to plead guilty.
The state charges alleged that besides asking for an appointment to the Appellate Division, Michalek was also given tickets to a pair of Buffalo Sabres hockey games. Pigeon also allowed a member of Michalek's family to attend a political fundraiser for free. The ticket price for the event was $1,000.
Michalek offered Pigeon information on cases in which he had an interest and also agreed to select a specific attorney to serve as a receiver despite that individual not being on a pre-approved list from the court. Michalek falsely said on a document with the Office of Court Administration that he needed the attorney based on their expertise.
Pigeon faces up to a year in prison on the state charges. He's currently free on $10,000 bail.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
- 2The Dynamic Duo Behind CMG's Legal Ops Team
- 3Land Use Issues Presented By Cold Storage Warehouses
- 4Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 5Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250