ADMINISTRATIVE LAW | MUNICIPALITIES
01-2-5589 Newfield Fire Company No. 1 vs. Borough of Newfield, App. Div. (Lihotz, J.A.D.) (17 pp.) We consider the scope of N.J.S.A. 40A:14-68, which allows a municipality to exercise “supervision and control” over a volunteer fire company designated as its official firefighting organization. Rejecting challenges by the plaintiff fire company, we conclude the statute allows the defendant borough to use an ordinance to set forth the terms and conditions upon which it would engage the volunteer fire company to perform the governmental function of firefighting. Further, the plain language of this statute reflects the Legislature’s intent to assure governmental supervision and control over volunteer fire companies to the extent they are charged with performing public functions funded by public taxpayer resources and the ordinance under review, as excised by the trial judge, does not exceed the designated authority. Finally, we note the fire company can reject the proposed terms and cease its role as the designated fire organization in the borough. If so, the borough is free to attempt to resolve the disagreements or contract with a neighboring fire company under the required terms. [Approved for publication.]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
