Third Circuit Slams Del. River Port's 'Perfunctory' Evaluation of Spurned Bidder
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed a lower court finding that the Delaware River Port Authority intentionally shut out the lowest bidder on a $17 million bridge-painting project.
April 07, 2017 at 05:04 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed a lower court finding that the Delaware River Port Authority intentionally shut out the lowest bidder on a $17 million bridge-painting project.
The appeals court upheld the decision of a U.S. district court judge in Camden that the DRPA “acted irrationally” when it rejected the low bid by plaintiff Alpha Painting & Construction Co. for failure to document its workplace safety record. The judge below correctly concluded that the DRPA “has gone out of its way” to award the contract to the second-lowest bidder, instead of the plaintiff, which submitted the lowest bid, the appeals court said in Alpha Painting & Construction v. Delaware River Port Authority. But the appeals court said the district judge exceeded his authority when he ordered the DRPA to award the contract to Alpha.
The agency, seeking bids to strip and repaint the Commodore Barry Bridge, required bidders to provide their OSHA 300 reports and Experience Modification Factors (EMFs) for New Jersey and Pennsylvania from the previous three years. OSHA 300 reports give a summary of a company's number of employees, number of injuries reported and a description of each injury. EMFs are an insurance industry index measuring the frequency and severity of workers' compensation claims against a company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Appellate Division Holds 'Clickwrap' Arbitration Provision Enforceable
5 minute readAppellate Division Ruling on Uber Eats Contract Highlights Evolution of 'Holding the Pen' Concepts
3 minute readFortune 500 Company Sues Metals Supplier Alleging It Used Proprietary Info Obtained During Bidding Process to Poach Talent
'A Confounding Record' Results in Sanctions for Discovery Violations in NJ Fed Court
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-60
- 2California Implements New Law Banning Medical Debt From Credit Reports
- 3Trump Picks Personal Criminal Defense Lawyers For Solicitor General, Deputy Attorney General
- 4Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin Offices
- 5Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250