New Opportunity to Make a Late and Inexpensive Portability Election
The IRS recently enacted Rev. Proc. 2017-34, which provides a permanent simplified method for certain estates to obtain an extension of time to elect portability.
July 24, 2017 at 02:21 PM
7 minute read
In 2011 “portability” was introduced, allowing the personal representative of an estate the opportunity to preserve a deceased spouse's unused federal estate and/or gift tax exemption amount for later use by the surviving spouse. Portability allows the surviving spouse to retain the exemption of his or her “last deceased spouse” which—in addition to his or her own federal estate and/or gift tax exemption amount—may be applied against future gifts by the spouse and/or his or her federal taxable estate upon death. Initially intended to expire after two years, on Jan. 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act was signed into law and in part made portability permanent.
In order to preserve portability, a personal representative is required to make an election on a timely filed IRS Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, following the death of the first spouse. If Form 706 is not filed within nine months of a decedent's death, or within 15 months if a request for an extension of time to file the return was timely obtained, a personal representative may be permanently prevented from preserving portability. While most taxpayers who have been actively advised by tax counsel have timely made portability elections, there were also many taxpayers caught off guard. With the substantial federal estate tax exemption amount (currently $5,490,000), certain taxpayers have assumed that there was no need to file a Form 706 upon the death of a spouse, and the missed election was only discovered after the expiration of the nine-month window.
In response to this, in 2014 the Internal Revenue Service published a Revenue Procedure which allowed certain estates of decedents dying after Dec. 31, 2010, and on or before Dec. 31, 2013, which did not timely elect to preserve portability and where a Form 706 was not otherwise required, a limited amount of time to make a late portability election by filing Form 706. After this window of time passed, the Service continued to allow late portability elections, but only allowed such elections in certain instances where a Form 706 was not otherwise required to be filed pursuant to Section 6018(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and only by private letter ruling, which typically involves a substantial commitment of cost by the estate and places a burden on the Service.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMcCarter & English Hires 10 Former Burns & Levinson Lawyers in Boston
Is Your Award Taxable? A Look at the Taxation of Judgments and Settlements
9 minute readNJ Town Prevails Over Verizon in Decade-Long Tax Battle in New Jersey Supreme Court
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250