Over 2,000 Accutane Suits Revived, Appeals Court Says Trial Judge Exceeded Gatekeeper Role
More than 2,100 suits by users of the acne drug Accutane who developed Crohn's disease have been reinstated after an appeals court ruled that expert testimony on behalf of plaintiffs was improperly excluded by the trial judge.
July 28, 2017 at 05:01 PM
8 minute read
More than 2,100 suits by users of the acne drug Accutane who developed Crohn's disease have been reinstated after an appeals court ruled that expert testimony on behalf of plaintiffs was improperly excluded by the trial judge.
Atlantic County Superior Court Judge Nelson Johnson exceeded his role as a gatekeeper when he concluded that plaintiffs' experts on gastroenterology and epidemiology were using accepted scientific methods to analyze the evidence in the case, the appeals court said. The decision also said the judge incorrectly determined the credibility of the testimony by plaintiffs' experts. The appeals court reversed an order barring expert testimony by the plaintiffs' experts and another order dismissing 2,174 cases.
Friday's decision was the second in one week's time from the Appellate Division that reversed dismissal of multicounty litigation cases concerning Accutane, which was marketed by Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. On Tuesday, a different panel of the Appellate Division reinstated a different set of 335 cases on other grounds. The week's rulings bring the aggregate number of Accutane cases pending in Atlantic County to more than 2,500.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen in Doubt: What's a Dubitante Opinion, and Why Do Judges Write Them?
NJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute read'The Process Is a Minefield': Appellate Div. Mulls Whether Confirmed Superior Court Judge Can Keep Her Pension
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250