Developer Wins Automatic Approval After Board Rebuffs Application
An application to build two high-rise buildings on the Hoboken waterfront is entitled to automatic approval after the city planning board refused to hold hearings on the plan, a New Jersey appeals court has ruled.
August 04, 2017 at 02:05 PM
3 minute read
An application to build two high-rise buildings on the Hoboken waterfront is entitled to automatic approval after the city planning board refused to hold hearings on the plan, a New Jersey appeals court has ruled.
The panel said a trial judge properly ruled in favor of the developer in three separate suits that were filed in the wake of the automatic approval. The planning board was aware that statutes required it to hear the application, and automatic approval would be granted if it did not, the appeals court said. The board received multiple letters from the applicant's attorney placing it on notice of its obligations, the appeals court said. And a transcript of a board hearing reveals the Hoboken officials intended to circumvent the automatic approval statute by denying the application without prejudice, but its expressed legal reasons for doing so were “palpably meritless,” the appeals court said in Shipyard Associates v. Hoboken Planning Board.
Hoboken has said it will appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen in Doubt: What's a Dubitante Opinion, and Why Do Judges Write Them?
NJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute read'The Process Is a Minefield': Appellate Div. Mulls Whether Confirmed Superior Court Judge Can Keep Her Pension
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250