A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a doctor who corrected a colleague’s alleged surgical errors should not have been permitted to opine on the standard of care in the resulting medical malpractice case.
A three-judge Appellate Division panel in Granovsky v. Chagaresordered a new trial for a plaintiff whose suit against the original treating physician resulted in a no-cause verdict.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
