Intellectual Property & Life Sciences
In the Law Journal's Intellectual Property & Life Sciences supplement, articles focus on the new challenges presented by 3D printing, and the…
September 18, 2017 at 01:38 PM
3 minute read
In the Law Journal's Intellectual Property & Life Sciences supplement, articles focus on the new challenges presented by 3D printing, and the impact of two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions (Sandoz v. Amgen and TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods) among other topics.
Protecting IP in a 3D Printed World
It is clear that 3D printing technology will blur the distinction between tangible and intangible forms by erasing the traditional divisions between manufacturers and consumers and what constitutes components of an infringing product. Read more
Congressional Research Service Reports on AIA's Impact on Innovation and Proposed Reform
A discussion of the Congressional report on the state of post-grant proceedings before the PTAB, and key components of a bill regarding post-grant proceedings, particularly, inter partes reviews (IPRs). Read more
Patent Litigation in the District of NJ After 'TC Heartland'
On May 22, the Supreme Court of the United States decided 'TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands,' which fundamentally changed the patent venue landscape. Read more
IP in the Digital Age: Protecting Against Domain Name and Social Media Infringement
The Internet, along with social media, has made intellectual property theft and infringement much easier. Clients must be vigilant in protecting their trademarks and copyrights in cyberspace. Read more
Supreme Court's 'Sandoz v. Amgen' Decision Favors Biosimilars
On June 12, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in 'Sandoz v. Amgen,' a highly anticipated case concerning key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, part of the larger Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009. Read more
In the Law Journal's Intellectual Property & Life Sciences supplement, articles focus on the new challenges presented by 3D printing, and the impact of two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions (Sandoz v. Amgen and TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods) among other topics.
Protecting IP in a 3D Printed World
It is clear that 3D printing technology will blur the distinction between tangible and intangible forms by erasing the traditional divisions between manufacturers and consumers and what constitutes components of an infringing product. Read more
Congressional Research Service Reports on AIA's Impact on Innovation and Proposed Reform
A discussion of the Congressional report on the state of post-grant proceedings before the PTAB, and key components of a bill regarding post-grant proceedings, particularly, inter partes reviews (IPRs). Read more
Patent Litigation in the District of NJ After 'TC Heartland'
On May 22, the Supreme Court of the United States decided 'TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands,' which fundamentally changed the patent venue landscape. Read more
IP in the Digital Age: Protecting Against Domain Name and Social Media Infringement
The Internet, along with social media, has made intellectual property theft and infringement much easier. Clients must be vigilant in protecting their trademarks and copyrights in cyberspace. Read more
Supreme Court's 'Sandoz v. Amgen' Decision Favors Biosimilars
On June 12, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in 'Sandoz v. Amgen,' a highly anticipated case concerning key provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, part of the larger Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009. Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readGOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Many Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
- 2What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 3Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 4US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 5‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250