A federal judge has refused to halt enforcement of New Jersey’s Criminal Justice Reform Act, finding that a constitutional challenge by a bail bond underwriter has little chance of succeeding.
In Holland v. Rosen, U.S. District Judge Jerome Simandle ruled that an injunction is not warranted in the suit because the plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success on their Fourth, Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment claims. What’s more, the balance of risks shows that the risk of harm to others if the injunction is granted is greater than the harm to plaintiffs if it is denied, the judge said in Thursday’s ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]