NJ Judge Moves Fruit Snacks Class Action Across the River
A federal judge in Trenton has ordered a New Jersey-based class action suit against Welch Foods Inc.---maker of the popular Welch's fruit snacks that plaintiffs allege aren't as "natural" as advertised---must be moved to the Eastern District of New York.
October 06, 2017 at 04:07 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Court for Eastern District of New York |
A federal judge in Trenton has ordered a New Jersey-based class action suit against Welch Foods Inc., maker of the popular Welch's fruit snacks that plaintiffs allege aren't as “natural” as advertised, must be moved to the Eastern District of New York.
U.S. District Judge Anne Thompson ordered the move on Oct. 5 after finding that nearly identical litigation has already been filed and is in discovery in the Eastern District.
“Although the causes of action on the New York litigation are under different state law … the nature of the issues, the relief sought, the products in question and the defendants all substantially overlap,” Thompson said in Hall v. Welch Foods.
“Plaintiff cannot maintain essentially the same litigation in two separate district courts, creating unnecessary burdens on the courts and risking the inefficiency and embarrassment of conflicting judgments,” Thompson said.
The lead plaintiff in the New Jersey case, Lauren Hall, is suing Welch Foods, based in Concord, Massachusetts, and one of its licensees, Promotion in Motion Companies, based in Media, Pennsylvania, over its fruit snacks. The lawsuit alleges breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, common-law fraud, violations of the state Consumer Fraud Act, unjust enrichment and violations of the state Truth in Consumer Contract, Warranty and Notification Act.
Hall says the companies falsely claimed that their snacks contained “significant amounts of natural fruit” and said that they were nutritious and healthy when they actually contained large amounts of artificial flavors and ingredients.
Hall initially filed her lawsuit in New Jersey Superior Court. Welch then moved the case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.
Thompson had two competing motions: One by Welch and PIM to move the case to the Eastern District, and another from Hall asking that it be remanded to the Superior Court.
Thompson said the case needed to be moved to the Eastern District so as not to waste judicial resources on essentially the same matter.
One of Hall's lawyers, Joshua Bauchner, said the firm was prepared to litigate the case in the Eastern District.
“The defendants can run, but they can't hide,” said Bauchner, of Ansell Grimm & Aaron in Woodland Park. “We will pursue claims against them wherever necessary.”
The lead attorney for Welch Foods and PIM, David King of the Newark office of Herrick Feinstein, said his clients were pleased with the ruling and are ready to proceed in the Eastern District.
Contact the reporter at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250