Linden Reaches $575K Settlement in Suit Over Judge's Missteps
Linden has agreed to pay $575,000 to settle a federal civil rights suit stemming from a municipal court case in which the town's judge served…
October 09, 2017 at 02:55 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Linden has agreed to pay $575,000 to settle a federal civil rights suit stemming from a municipal court case in which the town's judge served as both judge and prosecutor.
The settlement was awarded to cousins Wendell Kirkland and Anthony Kirkland in connection with irregularities in the handling of a 2010 criminal trial by then-Municipal Court Judge Louis DiLeo. The civil settlement was reached in April but terms were not disclosed at that time. The terms were first reported Oct. 5 on NJ Civil Settlements, a blog run by open-government activist John Paff, who obtained the terms through an Open Public Records Act request.
A Superior Court judge who overturned the Kirklands' convictions by DiLeo called the episode a “perversion of justice.” The Supreme Court issued a reprimand to DiLeo for his handling of the case. DiLeo had served as the town's municipal judge since 2003 but the city declined to reappoint him in 2012.
The parties reported to the court in December 2016 that a settlement had been reached in mediation before John Hughes, a former U.S. magistrate judge for the District of New Jersey who is now with JAMS in Philadelphia. The court administratively terminated the case in April.
The settlement agreement dictates that any party or their attorney who receives an inquiry from any third party about the case or the settlement should respond by saying only that “the matter has been settled.”
“The parties agree and understand the confidentiality requirements of this paragraph are a material inducement to their consent to this Agreement, and that a violation of these confidentiality requirements will be deemed a material breach of this agreement,” the settlement document states.
The settlement followed a 2014 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that said that motions by DiLeo and Linden to dismiss the suit were properly denied. The appeals court rejected DiLeo's defenses based on absolute judicial immunity and Eleventh Amendment immunity, and upheld counts against Linden based on direct liability and conspiracy. The appeals court found that Linden's claim that it is not liable for the judge's acts failed because the plaintiffs provided sufficient allegations that the city tacitly endorsed a practice of denying defendants their constitutional rights. The panel also found that the suit made sufficient allegations of a conspiracy between DiLeo and Linden to raise the right to relief above the speculative level. The suit alleged DiLeo tried the Kirklands after the prosecutor left the court session, questioning the arresting officer at trial and allowing the officer to question the Kirklands.
The suit also claimed that DiLeo did not provide public defenders to the Kirklands and found them guilty of marijuana possession without any lab evidence confirming that the substance they were carrying was indeed marijuana. The suit also claimed that after DiLeo found the brothers guilty, he sentenced them to jail terms that violated a state statute. He gave Wendell Kirkland 180 days in jail and three consecutive one-year terms of probation, and gave Anthony Kirkland two consecutive 180-day jail terms and three consecutive one-year probationary terms. But the suit said state law only allows a term of 90 days to be imposed in municipal court, not 180 days or two consecutive terms of 180 days. DiLeo's mandate that the sentences were “day for day,” meaning that the normal parole guidelines did not apply, also violated a state law that bars imposition of parole ineligibility in municipal court, the suit claimed.
The Kirklands were each charged with attempted theft after police in Linden found them trying to remove wheels from a vehicle. They were also charged with possession of 50 grams or less of marijuana. The Union County Prosecutor's Office downgraded the charges to disorderly persons offenses and directed that they be heard in municipal court.
Michael Rubas, the Jersey City lawyer who represented the Kirklands, did not return a call about the settlement. David Schwartz, of Schwartz & Posnock in Eatontown, representing Linden, and Robert Varady, of La Corte, Bundy, Varady & Kinsella in Union, representing DiLeo, also did not return calls.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readUnion Leader Awarded $662K Judgment Against Employer in Decade-Old Wiretap Suit
5 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times
- 2Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 3SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 4Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 5FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250