Court Says Injured Ex-Softball Player Can Sue Former Coach, League
A New Jersey woman who sustained severe teeth and mouth injuries as a teenage softball player will be allowed to sue her coach and the league for…
October 30, 2017 at 01:46 PM
7 minute read
A New Jersey woman who sustained severe teeth and mouth injuries as a teenage softball player will be allowed to sue her coach and the league for damages, a state appeals court ruled on Monday.
A two-judge Appellate Division panel said a Union County Superior Court judge erred when he dismissed plaintiff Madison Mone's lawsuit on summary judgment. Appellate Division Judges Amy O'Connor and Francis Vernoia said there were genuine issues of material fact that should be decided by a jury.
“The trial court may not resolve contested factual issues; it may only determine whether there are any genuine factual disputes,” the appeals court said.
Mone, who is now an adult, was injured in June 2007, when she was 13 and playing for a team in the Girls Softball League of Westfield, the ruling said. The league and her coach, Kim Graziadei, are the defendants.
According to the decision, Mone was injured while warming up a pitcher on the sidelines. She was struck in the face by a pitch, causing extensive damage that included the loss of one tooth, damage to other teeth, and facial and jaw damage.
She was wearing shin guards and a chest protector, but not a face mask at the time, the ruling said.
Factual disputes arose during deposition testimony from Mone and Graziadei, according to the ruling. Mone claims Graziadei said catchers warming up pitchers had to wear full equipment while on the field, but said nothing about wearing full equipment while warming up off the field of play and on the sidelines. Graziadei contends she made it clear during the first day of practice that players warming up pitchers had to wear full equipment.
The deposition testimony, the appeals court said, did not clarify whether Graziadei differentiated between warming up on or off the field.
There also is a dispute over whether Mone was actually supposed to play in that day's game. Mone said Graziadei told her she was, but Graziadei said she said nothing to Mone along those lines, and that Mone and the pitcher had, on their own, decided to warm up in foul territory.
The motion judge made a “credibility determination” and dismissed the lawsuit based on Graziadei's testimony, the Appellate Division said. “If there are materially disputed facts, a motion for summary judgment may not be granted,” the judges said.
“The question remains whether the coach was grossly negligent for failing to properly supervise [Mone],” the judges added.
Mone's attorney, Ralph Ferrara, said the appeals court made the correct decision because of the inconsistent deposition testimony.
Ferrara, of the Ferrara Law Group in Trenton, said Mone sustained severe damage and facial scarring in the accident.
Graziadei and the league are represented by Robert Ball of the Bedminster office of Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby. He said he was in the process of reviewing the ruling with his clients and declined to comment.
A New Jersey woman who sustained severe teeth and mouth injuries as a teenage softball player will be allowed to sue her coach and the league for damages, a state appeals court ruled on Monday.
A two-judge Appellate Division panel said a Union County Superior Court judge erred when he dismissed plaintiff Madison Mone's lawsuit on summary judgment. Appellate Division Judges
“The trial court may not resolve contested factual issues; it may only determine whether there are any genuine factual disputes,” the appeals court said.
Mone, who is now an adult, was injured in June 2007, when she was 13 and playing for a team in the Girls Softball League of Westfield, the ruling said. The league and her coach, Kim Graziadei, are the defendants.
According to the decision, Mone was injured while warming up a pitcher on the sidelines. She was struck in the face by a pitch, causing extensive damage that included the loss of one tooth, damage to other teeth, and facial and jaw damage.
She was wearing shin guards and a chest protector, but not a face mask at the time, the ruling said.
Factual disputes arose during deposition testimony from Mone and Graziadei, according to the ruling. Mone claims Graziadei said catchers warming up pitchers had to wear full equipment while on the field, but said nothing about wearing full equipment while warming up off the field of play and on the sidelines. Graziadei contends she made it clear during the first day of practice that players warming up pitchers had to wear full equipment.
The deposition testimony, the appeals court said, did not clarify whether Graziadei differentiated between warming up on or off the field.
There also is a dispute over whether Mone was actually supposed to play in that day's game. Mone said Graziadei told her she was, but Graziadei said she said nothing to Mone along those lines, and that Mone and the pitcher had, on their own, decided to warm up in foul territory.
The motion judge made a “credibility determination” and dismissed the lawsuit based on Graziadei's testimony, the Appellate Division said. “If there are materially disputed facts, a motion for summary judgment may not be granted,” the judges said.
“The question remains whether the coach was grossly negligent for failing to properly supervise [Mone],” the judges added.
Mone's attorney, Ralph Ferrara, said the appeals court made the correct decision because of the inconsistent deposition testimony.
Ferrara, of the Ferrara Law Group in Trenton, said Mone sustained severe damage and facial scarring in the accident.
Graziadei and the league are represented by Robert Ball of the Bedminster office of
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
'Point Us to the Plain Language': NJ Supreme Court Grills Defense Statutory Requirements for Affidavit of Merit
5 minute read3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250