Suits & Deals: Nerve Damage During Surgery Leads to $1.2M Verdict
A roundup of notable verdicts and settlements in New Jersey.
November 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM
4 minute read
An Essex County jury awarded $1.2 million on Oct. 26 to a high school student who sustained a severed nerve in her left leg during surgery to remove a bone growth.
The suit claimed orthopedic surgeon Steven Robbins of the Center for Orthopedics in West Orange made the error while removing a bone growth for a biopsy on Samantha Alpert, now 22.
After the operation, Alpert attended her senior prom and her high school graduation in a wheelchair, and was unable to continue playing on the school tennis team, where she had been an all-state player, said her lawyer, Bruce Nagel of Nagel Rice in Roseland. During surgery, the doctor cut halfway through her sathenous nerve, and she experiences numbness, pain and tingling down her left leg from the knee to the ankle, the suit claimed. She can walk, but does not run or jog.
The suit asserted that the chance that the bone growth was cancerous was very slight, given the patient's age, but the defense countered that there was reason to believe the growth might be cancerous, Nagel said.
Nagel said he offered to settle the case before trial for the doctor's $1 million policy limit, but Robbins and the Center for Orthopedics declined.
After a two-week trial before Superior Court Judge Annette Scoca, the jury found Robbins was negligent for performing unnecessary surgery and for failing to obtain informed consent from the patient and her parents. The jury awarded the plaintiff $1.2 million.
Nagel, who was assisted at trial by Susan Connors of his firm, said he would petition the court for fees of roughly $300,000 under the offer of judgment rule.
Louis John Dughi Jr. of Dughi, Hewit & Domalewski in Cranford, who represented the doctor and the Center for Orthopedics, did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|Somerset County Auto Case Settles for $1 Million
A man who claimed the injuries he sustained in a rear-end accident aggravated his neuromuscular disorder settled his Somerset Count suit Nov. 2 for $1 million.
In October 2015, Carl Foerster, then 69, was riding in the front seat of a vehicle driven by his wife around mile marker 85.6 of the Garden State Parkway south, in dense traffic, according to his attorney, Richard Brockway of Bramnick, Rodriguez, Grabas, Arnold & Mangan in Scotch Plains.
The vehicle slowed, and Foerster, who was wearing a seat belt, leaned forward to retrieve an item from the floor of the vehicle, when another motorist, Matthew G. Tietjen of Vineland, a sales representative for GNC who was driving a company vehicle on a sales call, struck the vehicle from behind. Foerster's head and neck struck the dashboard, Brockway said.
Tietjen pleaded guilty to careless driving, with a civil reservation, Brockway noted.
Foerster was hospitalized with neck pain and tingling in his fingers, and later transferred for a neurological examination with weakness and loss of control of his right arm and other symptoms. He was diagnosed with spinal cord compression at the cervical level, a fracture at the thoracic level, and a cervical nerve root and ligament injury at the cervical level, as well as other injuries, according to Brockway. Foerster underwent a multi-level laminectomy and implantation of hardware at the cervical level, and contracted a MRSA infection and aspiration pneumonia, Brockway said. Foerster underwent inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation, as well as home care.
Foerster previously had suffered from myasthenia gravis, an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder, but claimed his symptoms had been mininal until the accident. The suit claimed that his condition deteriorated because of the accident, leading to muscle weakness and spinal curvature, according to Brockway.
Foerster was retired at the time of the accident, and didn't claim lost wages.
The accident occurred in Ocean County, but the suit was filed in Somerset County, where Foerster lives. The defense disputed that Foerster's condition was attributable to the accident, Brockway said.
The parties were through discovery and awaiting a trial date when they reached a settlement during mediation with Daniel Mecca, a retired Bergen County Superior Court judge with Mecca Law in Paramus.
Tietjen was represented by Mario Colitti of Viscomi & Lyons in Morristown. A call to the firm about the case was not returned.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readSpoliation of Evidence Costs Defendants Nearly $850K in Sanction Award
4 minute readFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute read$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250