NJ Law 2017
The Law Journal releases NJ Law each fall to present readers with the various data projects produced over the course of the year, from the New Jersey…
November 20, 2017 at 12:00 AM
4 minute read
The Law Journal releases NJ Law each fall to present readers with the various data projects produced over the course of the year, from the New Jersey Top 40 to law firm summer hiring. It's also when the Law Journal unveils its Largest Law Firms listing, which takes stock of more than 100 of the state's biggest firms and branches. In order to make a truly valuable reference, information about firm practices, leadership and office locations also is included. It's always striking to see how varied—by practice, geography, size and otherwise—New Jersey's law firm landscape is.
The law firm staff worked hard on these projects. Thanks to the firms for engaging with us, and a special thanks to the Law Journal's summer intern, Maryam Asjad (Seton Hall University Class of 2017), for her invaluable assistance and hard work on the Largest Law Firms project.
Largest Law Firms – A listing of more than 100 firms and branches in the state, with information about office locations and leadership.
Lawyer Demographics – A snapshot of the demographics of the bar in New Jersey, and how it is changing.
Top 20 Personal Injury Results – A compilation of the largest injury case results reported in the Law Journal's Suits & Deals column for the year period ending August 2017.
The New Jersey Top 40 – A listing of the state's highest-earning firms and branches, based on fiscal 2016 revenue.
Summer Hiring at Large Firms – A listing of some of the state's robust summer associate programs, including information about class size and compensation.
Bond Counsel for NJ Public Financings (see below) – A listing of which public finance practices are advising the most—and the largest—government bond issues in New Jersey.
Top NJ Lawyer-Lobbyists (see below) – From state elections authority filings, the Law Journal examines which firms grossed the highest revenue in 2016 from their lobbying efforts.
The Law Journal releases NJ Law each fall to present readers with the various data projects produced over the course of the year, from the New Jersey Top 40 to law firm summer hiring. It's also when the Law Journal unveils its Largest Law Firms listing, which takes stock of more than 100 of the state's biggest firms and branches. In order to make a truly valuable reference, information about firm practices, leadership and office locations also is included. It's always striking to see how varied—by practice, geography, size and otherwise—New Jersey's law firm landscape is.
The law firm staff worked hard on these projects. Thanks to the firms for engaging with us, and a special thanks to the Law Journal's summer intern, Maryam Asjad (Seton Hall University Class of 2017), for her invaluable assistance and hard work on the Largest Law Firms project.
Largest Law Firms – A listing of more than 100 firms and branches in the state, with information about office locations and leadership.
Lawyer Demographics – A snapshot of the demographics of the bar in New Jersey, and how it is changing.
Top 20 Personal Injury Results – A compilation of the largest injury case results reported in the Law Journal's Suits & Deals column for the year period ending August 2017.
The New Jersey Top 40 – A listing of the state's highest-earning firms and branches, based on fiscal 2016 revenue.
Summer Hiring at Large Firms – A listing of some of the state's robust summer associate programs, including information about class size and compensation.
Bond Counsel for NJ Public Financings (see below) – A listing of which public finance practices are advising the most—and the largest—government bond issues in New Jersey.
Top NJ Lawyer-Lobbyists (see below) – From state elections authority filings, the Law Journal examines which firms grossed the highest revenue in 2016 from their lobbying efforts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Out-of-State Referral-Fee Rule Change Is Wrong, State Bar Argues to NJ Justices
5 minute read
Am Law 100 Firms Struggle to Meet Plans for Office Efficiency
NJSBA Annual Convention Addresses AI: 'Are There Legitimate Concerns? Absolutely'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
