Appeals Court Affirms $186K Fee Award in Rent Dispute Litigation
A New Jersey appeals court on Monday upheld an award of more than $186,000 in attorney fees to the owner of a Montclair office building and his accountant.
December 04, 2017 at 05:33 PM
4 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court on Monday upheld an award of more than $186,000 in attorney fees to the owner of a Montclair office building and his accountant, who have been embroiled in a dispute with a former tenant for a decade.
The three-judge Appellate Division panel said an Essex County Superior Court judge did not abuse her discretion when she awarded the fees to Howard Silver, the owner of 34 Label Street, and his accountant, Emer Featherstone.
Appellate Division Judges Susan Reisner, Richard Hoffman and Robert Gilson, in an unpublished ruling, denied the request from the former tenant, Richard Cecere, to overturn the fee award.
The fees are meant to reimburse Silver, 34 Label and Featherstone for what they paid to Roseland's McManimon, Scotland & Baumann to fight allegations that they overcharged Cecere and his company, R.C. Search Co., for rent and to regain possession of the space Cecere had leased.
“The ultimate goal in awarding attorney's fees is to allow reasonable fees that are not excessive,” the judges wrote in the per curiam decision.
Richard Trenk, the attorney representing Silver, 34 Label and Featherstone, welcomed the ruling.
“34 Label Street Associates is pleased that all of its rights and remedies were fully vindicated after nearly eight years of litigation,” said Trenk, of Trenk DiPasquale DellaFera & Sodono in West Orange.
William Northgrave of McManimon Scotland handled the original litigation. He declined to comment.
Cecere's attorney, Marlo Hittman of Belleville's Cozzarelli & Hittman, also declined to comment.
In a separate decision, the judges affirmed lower court rulings approving the rescission of the leases and barring another attorney, Frank Cozzarelli, from intervening in the case. Cozzarelli had taken a mortgage and security interest in one of the judgments against Cecere that was extinguished. Neither Cozzarelli nor his attorney, Stephen Dratch of Franzblau Dratch in Livingston, could be reached.
According to the court, Cecere's relationship with 34 Label Street began in 1993 when he leased office space for his now-defunct company. Three years later, he leased garage space, and in 2002, he signed a 99-year lease for another part of the property where he operated a restaurant, the ruling said.
In 2007, R.C. Search stopped paying rent for the office space, and Cecere stopped paying rent for the garage space. Cecere also stopped paying expenses and property taxes for the restaurant, according to the ruling.
After a trial, a judge in 2011 ordered Cecere to pay $149,468 in unpaid taxes and expenses for the restaurant; $190,501 for the office space; and $22,161 for unpaid rent on the garage space. The judge denied a request for attorney fees, even though the lease agreements for the office and garage spaces contained provisions allowing for the award of counsel fees, according to the decision.
An appeals court affirmed the amount of the judgment, but ordered a remand on the issue of attorney fees.
Superior Court Judge Stephanie Mitterhoff, who heard the case on remand, ordered Cecere and his company to pay 34 Label Street $100,373 in counsel fees for the litigation over the office space and $86,276 in counsel fees for the garage space litigation.
Cecere then appealed that ruling.
“Here, we find no abuse of discretion in the court's award of attorney's fees,” the Appellate Division said in affirming. “Given the nature and length of the litigation between Cecere and 34 Label, the attorney's fees award approved by Judge Mitterhoff was reasonable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute read3rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readNJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC Bar’s Proposed Anti-Discrimination, Harassment Conduct Rule Sees More Pushback
- 2California's Chief Justice Starts Third Year With Questions About Fires, Trump and AI
- 3Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds for $400M in New Step in 'It Ends With Us' Fight
- 4Top Leadership Changes Coming for NJ Attorney General's Office
- 5SCOTUSBlog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250