Appeals Court Affirms $186K Fee Award in Rent Dispute Litigation
A New Jersey appeals court on Monday upheld an award of more than $186,000 in attorney fees to the owner of a Montclair office building and his accountant.
December 04, 2017 at 05:33 PM
4 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court on Monday upheld an award of more than $186,000 in attorney fees to the owner of a Montclair office building and his accountant, who have been embroiled in a dispute with a former tenant for a decade.
The three-judge Appellate Division panel said an Essex County Superior Court judge did not abuse her discretion when she awarded the fees to Howard Silver, the owner of 34 Label Street, and his accountant, Emer Featherstone.
Appellate Division Judges Susan Reisner, Richard Hoffman and Robert Gilson, in an unpublished ruling, denied the request from the former tenant, Richard Cecere, to overturn the fee award.
The fees are meant to reimburse Silver, 34 Label and Featherstone for what they paid to Roseland's McManimon, Scotland & Baumann to fight allegations that they overcharged Cecere and his company, R.C. Search Co., for rent and to regain possession of the space Cecere had leased.
“The ultimate goal in awarding attorney's fees is to allow reasonable fees that are not excessive,” the judges wrote in the per curiam decision.
Richard Trenk, the attorney representing Silver, 34 Label and Featherstone, welcomed the ruling.
“34 Label Street Associates is pleased that all of its rights and remedies were fully vindicated after nearly eight years of litigation,” said Trenk, of Trenk DiPasquale DellaFera & Sodono in West Orange.
William Northgrave of McManimon Scotland handled the original litigation. He declined to comment.
Cecere's attorney, Marlo Hittman of Belleville's Cozzarelli & Hittman, also declined to comment.
In a separate decision, the judges affirmed lower court rulings approving the rescission of the leases and barring another attorney, Frank Cozzarelli, from intervening in the case. Cozzarelli had taken a mortgage and security interest in one of the judgments against Cecere that was extinguished. Neither Cozzarelli nor his attorney, Stephen Dratch of Franzblau Dratch in Livingston, could be reached.
According to the court, Cecere's relationship with 34 Label Street began in 1993 when he leased office space for his now-defunct company. Three years later, he leased garage space, and in 2002, he signed a 99-year lease for another part of the property where he operated a restaurant, the ruling said.
In 2007, R.C. Search stopped paying rent for the office space, and Cecere stopped paying rent for the garage space. Cecere also stopped paying expenses and property taxes for the restaurant, according to the ruling.
After a trial, a judge in 2011 ordered Cecere to pay $149,468 in unpaid taxes and expenses for the restaurant; $190,501 for the office space; and $22,161 for unpaid rent on the garage space. The judge denied a request for attorney fees, even though the lease agreements for the office and garage spaces contained provisions allowing for the award of counsel fees, according to the decision.
An appeals court affirmed the amount of the judgment, but ordered a remand on the issue of attorney fees.
Superior Court Judge Stephanie Mitterhoff, who heard the case on remand, ordered Cecere and his company to pay 34 Label Street $100,373 in counsel fees for the litigation over the office space and $86,276 in counsel fees for the garage space litigation.
Cecere then appealed that ruling.
“Here, we find no abuse of discretion in the court's award of attorney's fees,” the Appellate Division said in affirming. “Given the nature and length of the litigation between Cecere and 34 Label, the attorney's fees award approved by Judge Mitterhoff was reasonable.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250