High Court Voids Waiver of Third-Party Liability in Employment Contract
The New Jersey Supreme Court on Monday ruled that an employment contract limiting a worker's right to sue a third party after an injury is unenforceable.
December 11, 2017 at 03:03 PM
3 minute read
Justice Anne Patterson. Photo by Carmen Natale/ALM
The New Jersey Supreme Court on Monday ruled that an employment contract limiting a worker's right to sue a third party after an injury is unenforceable.
The court, in a unanimous ruling, said such waiver provisions run afoul of the public policy of protecting employees' rights and the plain language of the Workers' Compensation Act.
Justice Anne Patterson, writing for the court, said that though an employee injured on the job might receive workers' compensation benefits, the law does not bar him or her from suing a third party.
“An employee's right to workers' compensation benefits does not preclude his or her assertion of common-law personal injury or wrongful-death claims against a liable third party,” Patterson said.
The law, Patterson noted, does provide that any compensation that an injured plaintiff receives from a third party may be used to offset any lien from his or her employer's workers' compensation carrier.
In this case, Kenilworth-based Schering-Plough—through successor Merck & Co.—had asked the court to overturn the Appellate Division's holding that summary judgment was properly denied in the case of a security guard who was injured at its facility and awarded $900,000.
The appeals court last August in Vitale v. Schering-Plough said the contract provision between plaintiff Philip Vitale, the guard, and his employer, AlliedBarton Security Services, violated public policy by contradicting the letter and spirit of the Workers' Compensation Act because the guard was required as part of his employment to sign away his right to sue a third party.
According to documents, Vitale was walking down a dark stairway at Schering's Kenilworth facility in August 2009 when he tripped over a bag of snow-melting pellets left on the stairs. Vitale's experts opined that his injuries—which included reduced mobility in his shoulder and arm, and cognitive difficulties—were permanent, but Schering's experts said the injuries were minor and temporary.
Vitale received $45,552 in workers' compensation benefits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Supreme Court Steps In to Dismiss Controversial Ethics Complaint Against Mercer County Presiding Judge
5 minute readCEO Sues Blogger Who 'Sought to Destroy' Reputation of His Pro Athlete Company
3 minute readAmid Criticism of Quality of Care at Hospital, Childbirth Trauma Suit Yields $11.9M
4 minute readMcCarter & English Acquires Connecticut IP Boutique Harrington & Smith
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250