Judge's Suit Says She Was Harassed Over Hairstyle, Wardrobe
A state Superior Court judge has filed a suit accusing Bergen County's assignment judge of gender discrimination and creating a hostile work environment.
December 15, 2017 at 04:40 PM
4 minute read
A state Superior Court judge has filed a suit accusing Bergen County's assignment judge of gender discrimination and creating a hostile work environment.
Deborah Gross-Quatrone, who serves in the Civil Division in Essex County but previously was a family judge in Bergen County, filed the suit against Assignment Judge Bonnie Mizdol in federal court on Thursday. The suit follows an Advisory Committee on Professional Conduct complaint issued against Gross-Quatrone in March concerning her actions while working under Mizdol.
The suit says Mizdol created a hostile work environment by subjecting Gross-Quatrone to attendance rules that were not imposed on other judges and by keeping close tabs on her attendance. The gender discrimination count is based on comments Mizdol allegedly made about her appearance and clothing.
The civil suit also names Bergen County Trial Court Administrator Laura Simoldoni and Family Division Manager Diana Moskal as defendants.
“We just received a copy of the lawsuit,” judiciary spokesman Peter McAleer said in a statement. “We cannot comment on ACJC matters, but the Administrative Office of the Courts categorically denies any wrongdoing on the part of any of the employees named in the lawsuit.”
The suit also claims that Mizdol told Gross-Quatrone that court staff had complained about her demeanor. When Gross-Quatrone asked for elaboration, Mizdol said, “You come here with your fancy clothes and bare legs,” indicating that they were not suitable for a judge and could be the reason complaints were made about her, according to the suit. On another occasion, Mizdol allegedly told Gross-Quatrone she laughs “when I see you in your beach hair and flip-flops.”
Gross-Quatrone said she did not wear flip-flops during work hours but did wear them while entering the courthouse due to construction in the parking lot.
Mizdol's actions were motivated by a belief “that plaintiff's dress, hairstyle, jewelry and other expressions of traditionally feminine gender traits were not appropriate for a judge of the Superior Court,” the suit claims.
The suit also says that when Gross-Quatrone said she had planned an upcoming vacation, Mizdol responded, “Jesus Christ, do you have any other fucking vacation time I don't know about?” In addition, Mizdol told her she could not leave the courthouse during the day and that lunch breaks were discouraged. But another judge who was transferred to Bergen County at the same time, Christopher Kazlau, was not told of any such rules, the suit said. Mizdol also regularly visited or phoned Gross-Quatrone's chambers early in the morning to see if she was in, Gross-Quatrone alleges.
Gross-Quatrone was the president of the Bergen County Bar Association before she was confirmed to the bench in March 2015 and was a solo in Saddle Brook, where she also was a municipal court judge. She was admitted to the bar in 1990. In her private practice, Gross-Quatrone focused on family law and real estate matters. She is a graduate of Pace University School of Law and Montclair State.
Her suit said Gov. Chris Christie appointed her to sit in Bergen County but she was assigned to Passaic County, due in part to objections raised by Mizdol, the suit claims. She sat in Passaic County for a few months before she was reassigned to Bergen County.
In the summer of 2015, Gross-Quatrone hired Nadya Comas as her law clerk. The ACJC complaint says Gross-Quatrone instructed the clerk to work, without compensation, for nearly three weeks before the clerk's assignment was actually supposed to start. Gross-Quatrone has denied knowingly violating the ethics rules.
But Gross-Quatrone's suit says in its civil conspiracy county that Mizdol, Moskal and Simoldoni “acted in concert to fabricate and exaggerate complaints and allegations that plaintiff had been abusive to courthouse staff and that she violated a policy concerning the permitted start date for law clerks.”
The suit claims that the defendants violated federal civil rights laws by agreeing to conspire to falsely credit unfounded allegations by Comas and other court staff that Gross-Quatrone exposed them to a hostile work environment. The suit also claims a violation of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act.
Gross-Quatrone's lawyer, Benjamin Light of Maggs & McDermott in Wall, declined to comment on the case.
Gross-Quatrone did not return a reporter's call. Mizdol declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 2LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 3NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 4ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 5'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250