Bar Report - CAPITOL REPORT
Association advocates for measures in lame duck session, and NJSBA members are among new judicial appointees.
December 18, 2017 at 07:30 AM
4 minute read
Association advocates for measures in lame duck session
The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) was in Trenton last week for a day of committee hearings, urging elected officials to approve two bills.
One bill, A-4044 (Greenwald)/S-3574 (Bell), was approved in the New Jersey Senate Commerce Committee. It prohibits non-disclosure clauses in certain contracts, specifically those related to vehicles. The NJSBA believes the concept is a good one because of the information it seeks to allow would provide consumers with vital information and protect them from bad actors.
Assemblyman Louis Greenwald introduced the bill following a June report that a Tesla automobile owner who sought repairs to a front wheel that detached from his vehicle was told that the company would pay for a portion of the repairs, but only if he agreed not to make any public statements regarding the defect. Tesla has since modified language in its “goodwill agreements,” but Greenwald vowed to take it a step further by creating legislation to ban the practice.
The Judiciary's Foreclosure Mediation Program, S-1130 (Rice)/A-1029 (Jasey), was also voted out of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee last week and faces a full vote in the Senate. The bill codifies the Judiciary's program established in 2009 in response to the increase in residential foreclosures.
The bill underwent amendments earlier this month to eliminate the requirement for the use of a “trained foreclosure prevention and default mitigation counselor” to act as mediator in any controversy submitted to the mediation program. The bill now leaves it up to the court to determine the qualifications necessary for a person to serve as a mediator.
Despite these changes, the NJSBA remains concerned that the penalties imposed on those who are deemed to have mediated in bad faith could cripple homeowners and put mediators in a position to compromise their confidentiality to ascertain good faith. Moreover, given the recent filing fee increases across the board following criminal bail reform, the bill's proposal to add a $50 filing fee to foreclosures adds yet another user tax on litigants. The NJSBA's position has always been that the courts should be accessible to all residents, and that taxpayers should share that responsibility.
NJSBA members among new judicial appointees
The New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee last week cleared the way for the appointment of 27 new judges, including a current and two former trustees of the NJSBA. Trustee Marc R. Brown, of Cranford, and former trustees Daniel L. Weiss, of Asbury Park, and James J. Ferrelli, of Mount Laurel, were among the nominees in a packed agenda that included nominations for the tax court, workers' compensation court, administrative law court and two county prosecutors.
The nominations conclude a session that started off with a contentious battle between the governor and the Senate president over vacancies and tenure nominations of superior court judges. The nominations stalled over a disagreement about who should be nominated to the Supreme Court.
Those named to the superior bench were:
Lorraine M. Augostini,* of Sparta; Avis Bishop-Thompson,* of Teaneck; Patrick J. Bradshaw,* of New Brunswick; Anne Marie Bramnick, of Westfield; Thomas J. Buck,* of Milltown; Patricia E. Carney,* of Basking Ridge; Joseph M. Chiarello,* of Millville; Lara K. DiFabrizio,* of Scotch Plains; George H. Gangloff Jr.,* of West Deptford; Richard L. Hertzberg,* of Warren Township; Thomas K. Isenhour,* of Middletown; Sarah Beth Johnson,* of Margate City; Michael E. Joyce, of Pennsauken; Kurt Kramer,* of Cherry Hill; Lourdes Lucas,* of Fair Haven; Thomas D. McCloskey,* of Flemington; Carol Novey Catuogno,* of Franklin Lakes; Ellen Torregrossa O'Connor,* of Middletown; Sheree Velita Pitchford, of Dunellen; Lisa A. Puglisi,* of Burlington;
Michael J. Rogers,* of Bloomsbury; Mitchell I. Steinhart,* of Fair Lawn; Gary K. Wolinetz, of Plainsboro; and William F. Ziegler,* of Mullica Hill.
In addition to these newly named judges, three were nominated for tenure: Angela Borkowski, Linda Grasso Jones and George S. Leone.
* denotes NJSBA member
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250