MCL Designation Sought for New Jersey Cases Linking Abilify to Gambling
Both plaintiff and defense counsel want to ensure that any future cases end up in Bergen County with the 47 others now pending.
December 28, 2017 at 05:31 PM
4 minute read
Both plaintiff and defense counsel in litigation alleging that use of the popular antipsychotic drug Abilify caused patients to engage in compulsive behavior are asking for a multicounty litigation designation, to ensure that any future cases end up in Bergen County with the 47 others now pending.
In a joint application filed weeks ago but only recently made public, the parties are asking the judiciary to have the suits assigned to Superior Court Judge James DeLuca for case management.
In March 2016, Bergen County Superior Court Judge Brian Martinotti consolidated the nine cases then existing for consolidation. Since then, Martinotti has become a U.S. District Court judge, and the cases have all been assigned to DeLuca.
The Nov. 21 application is seen primarily as a pre-emptive move in case any lawsuits are filed in any other county. So far, no Abilify cases have been filed outside of Bergen County, according to the lead plaintiffs attorney, Rayna Kessler.
The pending cases already have advanced considerably and consolidation of those cases and any future ones would be beneficial to all sides, Kessler said in the application to Appellate Division Judge Glenn Grant, the acting administrative director of the courts.
“Centralization will provide a fair and more convenient, cost effective process for all parties, witnesses, counsel and the court,” wrote Kessler, of New York's Robins Kaplan. “Centralized management will conserve judicial resources and provide all parties with the benefits of coordinated discovery.”
In a Dec. 27 notice to the bar, Grant said public comments on the application would be accepted until Jan. 26.
At least 410 other Abilify suits have been filed in federal courts, and they have been assigned to U.S. District Judge Casey Rodgers of the North District of Florida under the federal multidistrict litigation designation, according to the application.
The plaintiffs commenced filing lawsuits in January 2016 against Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. of New York and Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc. of Princeton, a subsidiary of Tokyo-based Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., alleging that Abilify, the drug they developed and marketed, leads some patients to engage in compulsive behavior, most notably gambling.
The drug is used to treat bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and depression, and is one of the companies' biggest sellers, according to the lawsuits.
“Defendants knew or should have known that Abilify, when taken as prescribed and intended, causes and contributes to an increased risk of serious and dangerous side effects including, without limitation, uncontrollable compulsive behaviors such as compulsive gambling,” said one of the first complaints, filed by Kessler on behalf of plaintiff James Robbins.
David Field of Roseland's Lowenstein Sandler represents Bristol-Myers. He was unavailable for comment on the MCL application. Otsuka's attorney, Luke Connelly of the New York office of Winston & Strawn, declined to comment. Kessler declined to comment beyond what was written in the MCL application.
Robbins' suit says Otsuka developed Abilify in 2002 and, along with Bristol-Myers, soon began producing and developing the drug worldwide.
The complaint, citing Bristol-Myers marketing materials, said that by 2013 Abilify had become the company's biggest-selling drug, with revenues of $2.3 billion. Between April and June 2014, sales of Abilify reached $417 million in the U.S. and $515 million worldwide, according to the suit.
The lawsuits say that in 2012, the European Medicines Agency, the London-based entity of the European Union that regulates pharmaceuticals in Europe, began requiring that warnings be placed on the drug's labels that said using Abilify could lead to “pathological gambling.” Similar warnings are placed on the drug's packaging in Canada, Robbins' complaint says.
But, according to the complaint, there were no comparable warnings on packaging in the U.S., despite “thousands” of complaints about Abilify's side effects from 2009 to 2011.
Robbins' complaint says he used the drug between 2004 and 2014 and started gambling compulsively, losing $75,000. The gambling stopped, the suit claims, once he ceased using Abilify.
Similar lawsuits have been filed in New York, Indiana, Florida and Minnesota.
The plaintiffs claim breach of warranty, negligence, violation of federal drug-related statutes and regulations, negligent misrepresentation, violations of New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act and fraudulent concealment. They also seek punitive damages.
In the prior consolidation motion, both Bristol-Myers and Otsuka agreed that pretrial proceedings should be consolidated so as to coordinate discovery, reduce costs and eliminate the risk of inconsistent rulings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250