Six Flags Sued Over Failure to Protect Patrons' Credit Card Numbers
Amusement park operator Six Flags Entertainment faces a potential class action claiming it failed to comply with a 2003 federal law requiring truncation of credit card numbers on cash register receipts.
January 05, 2018 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
Amusement park operator Six Flags Entertainment faces a potential class action claiming it failed to comply with a 2003 federal law requiring truncation of credit card numbers on cash register receipts.
Six Flags–which is headquartered in Grand Prairie, Texas–was accused in the suit of committing thousands of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act's requirement that cash register receipts print no more than five digits of a customer's credit card number. The sole named plaintiff in the case, Yaakov Katz, says he was issued a receipt at the company's Six Flags Great Adventure park in New Jersey with 10 digits of his American Express card number. FACTA provides statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation, and the suit seeks attorney fees, costs and punitive damages.
Six Flags had ample warning of the act's requirement to truncate credit card numbers, as well as its requirement not to show card expiration numbers on receipts, which went into effect in 2006, according to the suit by Ryan Gentile of Gus Farinella's office in Floral Park, New York. The complaint cites announcements and notices about the truncation requirement from the Federal Trade Commission, credit card processors, cash register manufacturers, and the companies that issue Visa, MasterCard and Discover cards.
“Despite defendants' long-standing actual knowledge of FACTA's requirements, defendants operated for a substantial period of time, possibly since FACTA first went into effect, in reckless, i.e. willful, disregard of FACTA's requirements and continue to use cash registers or other point of sale machines or devices that printed receipts in violation the truncation requirement after 2006,” the suit claims.
The suit names Six Flags Entertainment and Six Flags Great Adventure as defendants. It was brought on behalf of a nationwide class of persons who used a debit or credit card at any Six Flags location and were given an electronically printed receipt showing more than the last five digits of their card number after Nov. 5, 2012. Six Flags has 17 amusement park and water park locations in the United States.
The suit was filed in state Superior Court in Ocean County on Nov. 30 and removed to federal court on Jan. 4. Plaintiffs lawyer Gentile declined to comment on the case. Andrea D'Ambra of Norton Rose Fulbright in New York, who filed the removal notice for Six Flags, also declined to comment on the case, as did Six Flags spokeswoman Sandra Daniels.
A similar suit in the District of New Jersey, Kamal v. J. Crew Group, was dismissed in October 2016 based on a finding that the lack of actual damages fails to satisfy the requirement of a “concrete” injury under the U.S. Supreme Court case Spokeo v . Robins.
In Kamal, U.S. District Judge William Martini of the District of New Jersey dismissed a class suit against retailer J.Crew upon finding that without evidence of fraudulent credit card use, a customer whose account number is printed on a store receipt has not suffered sufficient harm to confer Article III standing,
A similar suit against Donna Karan International in the Southern District of New York was dismissed for the same reason in May 2017.
But in 2012 another amusement park company, Palace Entertainment, gave class members free amusement park tickets to settle a suit in the Western District of Pennsylvania over violations of PASPA. And in another Western District of Pennsylvania case over failure to redact parts of credit card numbers, Pittsburgh sandwich shop Primanti gave thousands of customers a free sandwich each to settle its case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute readNJ Appellate Division Holds 'Clickwrap' Arbitration Provision Enforceable
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250