Waterfront Commission Lawsuit Seeks to Block New Jersey Withdrawal
The commission is seeking to enjoin New Jersey from enforcing legislation that would eliminate the commission and have the State Police, at least on the west side of the Hudson River, control law enforcement.
January 17, 2018 at 01:39 PM
4 minute read
The Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, created more than six decades ago to fight the sort of seaport mob control depicted in “On the Waterfront,” has filed a lawsuit seeking to ensure that it won't be dissolved or have its authority cut in half.
The commission is seeking to enjoin New Jersey from enforcing legislation that would eliminate the commission and have the State Police control law enforcement, at least on the west side of the Hudson River.
The commission was created in 1953 by a joint legislative enactment of New York and New Jersey, and approved by Congress and the administration of President Dwight Eisenhower. The states moved to create the commission after a series of Pulitzer Prize-winning articles in the New York Sun describing how organized crime controlled nearly all aspects of operations at the region's ports.
The creation of the commission was the inspiration behind the 1954 film “On the Waterfront,” which won eight Academy Awards, including best actor for Marlon Brando.
Now-former Gov. Chris Christie, on his last day in office Monday, signed legislation, without comment, that would allow the state to withdraw from the interstate compact that created the commission.
The law requires that the New Jersey State Police handle the duties associated with screening the employees who work on the docks. These responsibilities would include processing licensing applications by would-be employees and companies seeking to work at the ports, and supervise the hiring of longshoremen, checkers and pier guards in the ports on the New Jersey side.
“While it's served a purpose in the past, the commission and its restrictive oversight of hiring practices at the port has now become an impediment to economic growth,” Assemblyman Thomas Giblin, D-Essex, one of the chief sponsors, previously said.
“We cannot allow this at one of the busiest ports in the country,” Giblin said.
Christie had vetoed identical legislation in 2015, siding with the commission, which argued that New Jersey could not unilaterally withdraw from the compact.
The commission filed its lawsuit in U.S. District Court in New Jersey a day after Christie, a Republican, signed the bill, naming the state's new governor as of Tuesday, Democrat Philip Murphy, as the lead defendant. The lawsuit has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton, sitting in Newark.
The commission has retained New York's Proskauer Rose as its counsel.
“The commission's current administration has worked tirelessly to stamp out corruption and racketeering at the port, as well as to combat discriminatory hiring practices, but there is more work to be done,” the complaint says.
“New Jersey lacks the power to withdraw from the commission and its compact,” it adds.
Indeed, for the commission to be dissolved entirely, New York would have to pass identical legislation, which in turn would need to be approved by the federal government.
“The commission has worked to effectuate a dramatic change in the culture of an industry which has been chronically plagued, historically and currently, by organized crime and labor racketeering,” the commission alleges.
The commission is in charge of virtually all operations of 1,500 miles of port activities from Westchester County to Nassau County in New York, and in Bergen, Hudson, Union and Essex counties in New Jersey.
The lead attorney for the commission, Michael Cardozo, said the commission felt the need to move quickly.
“The statute goes into effect almost immediately, within 30 days,” Cardozo said. “The major point is that under a compact like this, a state can't unilaterally withdraw.”
Representatives for Murphy did not respond to requests for comment.
Leland Moore, a spokesman for recently confirmed New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250