DOJ Says Menendez Defense Counsel Used Race, Politics as Jury Nullification Tactics
The U.S. Department of Justice, preparing for a retrial of U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen, said in a court filing that defense lawyers invited jurors to nullify the law by injecting race and partisan politics into the proceedings.
January 22, 2018 at 04:14 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Department of Justice, preparing for a retrial of U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, and Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen, said in a court filing that defense lawyers invited jurors to nullify the law by injecting race and partisan politics into the proceedings.
Steps should be taken to prevent a repeat during the second trial, prosecutors said in a motion to U.S. District Judge William Walls on Jan. 19. The motion also said jurors in the first trial were forced to negotiate a “gauntlet” of relatives, supporters and attorneys for Menendez and Melgen when arriving at the courtroom and asked for “safeguards” to be implemented to prevent such contact. In addition, prosecutors took issue with Menendez's periodic prayer circles with clergy during the trial and his singing of hymns such as “Amazing Grace” in hallways and elevators at the courthouse.
The prosecutors' motion to U.S. District Judge William Walls said defense counsel's references during the two-month trial to the Hispanic heritage of Menendez and Melgen and statements linking the prosecution to President Donald Trump were prejudicial. The motion was filed on the same day that the DOJ announced plans to retry Menendez and Melgen on corruption charges after their first trial ended in a hung jury in November.
Defense lawyers accused the government of racial animus in remarks to the jury, the Department of Justice said, citing statements such as “The government wants you to believe that this entire friendship was a sham. That these men were using each other to get things. That just because of their heritage, that they are somehow corrupt.”
The government also cited a defense lawyer's statement during the trial, which said, “Sal and Bob were part of a fellowship of Hispanic Americans, entrepreneurs, businessmen, doctors, lawyers, politicians. … Their idea was to pay it forward, help young Hispanic Americans improve their lives. Lift up their cultural community. Play a larger role in American society. That's what Dr. Melgen was about. And this case is not only an attack on these two men, it's an attack on that whole group.”
Melgen was born in the Dominican Republic and is a naturalized U.S. citizen. Menendez was born in the United States to Cuban immigrant parents.
Also in its motion, the prosecution took issue with an apparent attempt to link the prosecuting attorneys in the case to the Trump administration, citing a defense lawyer's statement at trial: “When these prosecutors come into the courtroom, they oftentimes say I am here on behalf of the United States or for the United States and they are from the executive branch of government. Their boss is the attorney general of the United States and the president.”
Such references were made to introduce the notion of jury nullification, and the court should “actively safeguard the integrity of its proceedings by precluding such improper comments,” the DOJ motion said. The case “is not about race and it is not a referendum on the current Administration, nor the last. The defendants' racially and politically charged comments have no place in the courtroom and serve only to confuse the issues and invite the jury to nullify the law by reaching a verdict in violation of its oath.”
To prevent the defense from inviting the jury to make improper considerations of ethnicity or partisan politics, the prosecution asked Walls to “prohibit the defendants from making irrelevant and improper arguments or comments at trial based on race, political affiliation, or any other extraneous claims that invite nullification. The Court should also arrange for the jury's private and secure entrance to and exit from the courthouse.”
Menendez has been accused of intervening in a Medicare billing dispute on behalf of Melgen's ophthalmology practice, contacting executive branch officials to discuss regulation of Melgen's port security business, and seeking to expedite visa applications for three of the doctor's women friends.
Prosecutors say that between 2006 and 2013, Melgen donated $700,000 to Democratic political action committees, provided Menendez luxury hotel accommodations in Paris and the Dominican Republic, and gave the senator free flights on his private jet and on commercial airlines.
Kirk Ogrosky of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer in Washington, who represents Melgen, said of the DOJ motion, “We will respond to all written filings by the government, and our filings will speak for themselves.”
Menendez's lead counsel, Abbe Lowell of Norton Rose Fulbright in Washington, did not respond to a request for comment about the DOJ motion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute read‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250