As Opioid Push Continues, NJ Proposes Reporting Requirements for Gabapentin
New Jersey pharmaceutical regulators are proposing to closely monitor prescriptions for gabapentin, a drug that's nonaddictive but can be misused to enhance the effects of opioids and other addictive drugs.
January 25, 2018 at 02:01 PM
2 minute read
New Jersey pharmaceutical regulators are proposing to closely monitor prescriptions for gabapentin, a drug that's nonaddictive but can be misused to enhance the effects of opioids and other addictive drugs.
State Attorney General Gurbir Grewal and Sharon Joyce, the acting director of the Division of Consumer Affairs, announced a proposed one-year trial program that would require drug stores to report sales of gabapentin.
The reporting requirement could become permanent, they said in a statement.
“The director believes that the monitoring of prescriptions issued for gabapentin is warranted in light of growing concern about the use of gabapentin for purposes other than those authorized under federal law and the potential side effects associated with the misuse of this medication,” the Jan. 23 statement said.
Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant normally prescribed to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. However, the drug can be misused to enhance the euphoric effects of opioids, muscle relaxants and anxiety medications, officials said.
A 2016 study by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry estimated that one in five users of gabapentin abuse the medication, according to the statement.
Grewal and Joyce said there were 57 million prescriptions written for gabapentin in the United States in 2015, a 42 percent increase from 2011.
Seven other states, they said, currently require reporting of gabapentin prescriptions.
The move is a continuation of an effort by former Gov. Chris Christie to combat opioid addiction in the state.
Last February, Christie signed legislation that limits prescriptions for opioids to five days. Most recently, Christie was the chairman of the President's Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVolkswagen Hit With Consumer Class Action Alleging Defective SUV Engines
3 minute read'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute readSeton Hall Escapes COVID-19 Wrongful Death Suit After Student Found Dead in Dorm
4 minute readNJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Carolina Physicians Challenge Abortion Ban Under Religious Freedom Claims
- 2Special Series Part 5: The State’s Bond Lock Impermissibly Delegates Legislative Authority
- 3President-Elect Donald Trump Sentenced to Unconditional Discharge
- 4JCPenney Customer's Slip-and-Fall From Bodily Substance Suit Best Left for a Jury to Decide, Judge Rules
- 5Products Liability: The Absence of Other Similar Claims—a Defense or a Misleading Effort to Sway a Jury?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250