Ethics Complaint Charges NJ Municipal Judge With Touting Position During DWI Arrest
A municipal court judge in New Jersey is charged with trying to use the power of his office to talk his way out of a drunken driving charge.
January 25, 2018 at 05:45 PM
3 minute read
A municipal court judge in New Jersey won acquittal in the drunken driving case against him, but he's now charged by ethics authorities with trying to use the power of his office to talk his way out of the arrest.
The state Supreme Court's Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct filed the complaint on Wednesday against Wilfredo Benitez, who was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1993 and currently sits as a part-time judge in East Orange and Belleville.
According to the ACJC complaint, Benitez, a Newark solo, was arrested on Nov. 12, 2016, by State Troopers Justin Kearns and Danny Kim, who found Benitez asleep in the driver's seat on Interstate 80 west in Teaneck.
Benitez's eyes were bloodshot and watery, and the troopers could detect the odor of alcohol, the ACJC complaint says.
Kearns asked Benitez whether he had been drinking or taking drugs.
“Not at all, sir,” Benitez replied, according to the ACJC complaint.
The troopers allegedly had Benitez perform several roadside sobriety tests, and he was then charged with drunken driving.
While he was being handcuffed, the complaint alleges, Benitez began to object.
“I mean what are you trying to do? I'm a judge,” he said, according to the complaint.
“You're wasting your time. You know you are. You're not going to give me courtesy? You know you're being a dick. I will fucking fight you,” the complaint quotes Benitez as saying.
A Bergen County Superior Court judge, who was not identified in the complaint, eventually found Benitez not guilty on the drunken driving charge, the ACJC said.
Nevertheless, the ACJC filed a complaint alleging Benitez violated ethics rules by citing his position as a judge during the traffic stop. The ACJC said Benitez violated Canon 1 of the Code of Judicial Conduct by using profanity in front of the troopers, thus impugning the integrity of the judiciary; and Canon 2 by creating the appearance of impropriety, and by using the prestige of his office to advance his private interests.
Benitez has not yet filed an answer to the complaint, and he did not return a call seeking comment.
The complaint will be heard by the ACJC at a yet-undetermined date. Whether Benitez will be subject to disciplinary action, or have the complaint dismissed, is to be determined by the state Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute read
Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read
On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
