Judges OK Medicaid Benefits for Immigrant Who Left, Then Returned
A New Jersey appeals court ruled Wednesday that a legal immigrant, who temporarily returned to his native country and then came back to New Jersey, may still be entitled to Medicaid benefits.
February 14, 2018 at 05:06 PM
3 minute read
Judge Ellen Koblitz.
A New Jersey appeals court ruled Wednesday that a legal immigrant, who temporarily returned to his native country and then came back to New Jersey, may still be entitled to Medicaid benefits.
A three-judge Appellate Division panel in a published decision Tuesday said the petitioner, identified only as K.K., is qualified to receive benefits because of the length of time he lived in the United States before he temporarily left for his native country, India.
Because K.K. had lived so long in the United States, and had already qualified for benefits, those benefits should not be revoked, said Appellate Division Judges Jose Fuentes, Ellen Koblitz and Thomas Manahan.
“A lapse in continuous presence is … permitted, so long as an individual has already obtained qualified alien status,” Koblitz wrote for the panel.
The court referred to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, which “was enacted by Congress to continue the federal immigration policy of promoting self-sufficiency and self-reliance of immigrants to reduce the burden on public benefits,” and led to amendments to Medicaid law.
K.K.'s “absence from the country for seven years after reaching the age of 65 relieved the government of making Medicaid payments during that time, thus safeguarding the taxpayer's resources,” the panel said. “In light of federal immigration policy intended to reduce the burden on public benefits, such absences need not be discouraged.”
K.K., now 88, immigrated to the United States in 1991 and became a legalized permanent resident. He eventually began receiving $226 a month in Social Security benefits, the ruling said.
K.K. returned to India in 2007, returning to the United States in 2014. A year later, he applied for Medicaid benefits.
The state Department of Human Services denied his claim, saying that under the state Medical Assistance and Health Services Act, he was not qualified to receive benefits because he was not a permanent resident for at least five years. The agency considered his entry date to be 2014, when he returned from the stay in India, not 1991, when he first entered the United States.
K.K. appealed, contending that the law entitled him to benefits since he had been a legal permanent resident before 1996, and the Appellate Division agreed “based on the plain wording of the Medicaid eligibility statute, N.J.S.A. 30:4D-3(q)(1)(a).”
K.K.'s lawyer, Somerville solo Kevin Kovacs, said only that the appeals court correctly applied regulations governing the granting of benefits.
The Attorney General's Office, which represented the DHS, did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSend Us Your New Partners for the NJ Law Journal's New Partners Yearbook
1 minute readTensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
4 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Trenk Isabel; Connell Foley; Faegre Drinker; ABOTA Northern NJ Chapter
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250