BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJSBA testifies in support of gestational carrier bill amidst controversial testimony.
February 19, 2018 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
NJSBA testifies in support of gestational carrier bill amidst controversial testimony
After sometimes emotionally charged testimony, the Assembly Women and Children Committee voted S-482 (Vitale)/A-1704 (Huttle), the New Jersey Gestational Carrier Agreement Act, out of committee. The bill was also voted out of the Assembly last week. New Jersey State Bar Association's Deb Guston, former chair of the LGBT Section, testified in support of the bill.
The bill authorizes gestational carrier agreements and sets best practices for attorneys and licensed professionals in creating gestational carrier agreements. While surrogacy occurs in New Jersey, no law recognizes these agreements. The bill's sponsor, Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle, testified that the bill is long overdue to protect the intended parents, the gestational carrier, and the child.
“Ignoring the legal issues that accompany technological advancements does not remove the challenges, it merely adds an additional burden on loving couples or individuals who are already struggling to have a child,” said Huttle. “Without this legislation, intended parents and gestational surrogates will continue having children through these agreements but without legal protections, or they will be forced to move to other states that afford them with more security.”
Guston, also a fellow of the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys, testified in support of the bill both in the Senate two weeks ago and last week. She outlined the framework for the intent of the bill — to establish best practices and address gaps in current practice under the New Jersey Court Rules regarding parentage.
“This allows all parties to be educated and counseled in their rights and obligations before the contract becomes binding” said Guston. “Without this bill, gestational surrogacy will remain unregulated, unenforceable, and the rights of all adults and children born of these arrangements remain unprotected.”
The bill has a storied history, having been vetoed by Governor Chris Christie twice since its introduction in 2012. Harold Cassidy, an attorney who represented Mary Beth Whitehead of the famed Baby M case, testified in opposition to the bill. Whitehead was the surrogate mother who initially agreed to bear a child for another couple using her own egg. She later changed her mind, which led to a heated legal battle that granted Whitehead parental rights, although the couple had parental rights.
Cassidy said the bill would exploit women who carry babies because of the compensation they receive. He also commented that the bill would weaken women's rights.
Huttle has pointed out that this bill does not involve biological parents, rather cases that utilize a donor egg and donor sperm.
“I was taken aback by your testimony,” committee chair Gabriela Mosquera said in response to Cassidy's testimony. “This is a contract between adults. These are vetted individuals. I don't believe these gestational carriers are being exploited and as a woman I take offense to think that gestational carriers are being duped somehow.”
Assemblywoman Annette Chaparro made an emotional statement in support of the bill, as did Mosquera, who tearfully read in the statement of an intended parent in support of the bill, recounting her own experiences of surrogacy.
The bill heads to a full vote of the Senate. The NJSBA continues to monitor the legislation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250