Law Firm GC a Role for the Seasoned, but That Means Grooming a Successor
To fill the role of general counsel, law firms typically look for someone with the years of experience needed to confront difficult and potentially costly issues in an unflinching way.
February 21, 2018 at 04:23 AM
6 minute read
Joseph Bottitta.
To fill the role of general counsel, law firms typically look for someone with the years of experience needed to confront difficult and potentially costly issues in an unflinching way.
Firm GCs talk of open-door policies and around-the-clock availability—even, for many, while simultaneously trying to build or maintain law practices of their own. It's a position that's often occupied by someone who has been doing it for decades, or who otherwise has a wealth of experience and training, which makes sense, but then that raises the issue of finding a replacement.
Keeping that seat filled is vital, as it seems law firms' need for devoted in-house counsel is as significant as ever.
“The big firms understand they need it. … The smaller firms and the solos really need it, but they can't afford it,” said Joseph Bottitta, ethics counsel at Genova Burns. “It's the great middle that should pay more attention to it than I think they do.”
Frank Ciuffani of Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer in Woodbridge, for 17 years a Superior Court judge, returned in April 2017 to the firm, where he had practiced for decades prior to joining the bench. He was named GC in early 2018, replacing Ellen Torregrossa-O'Connor, who herself was appointed to the Superior Court.
The 600- to 700-hour per year role is not one that Ciuffani, soon to be 71, will keep for years on end.
Frank Ciuffani.
“We did not have a GC when I left” the firm in 2008, and “the managing partner essentially served in that role,” said, Ciuffani, who is also in the process of building an ADR practice.
Ciuffani added that his experience as a judge—particularly a chancery judge—suited him to the GC role.
“I was [a] general equity judge, so my decisions were my decisions. … I think they [firm management] knew I had pretty good judgment. … And I had the time to devote to the task,” Ciuffani said.
Another Wilentz Goldman attorney, litigator John Hogan, was appointed assistant GC and is being groomed to take over for Ciuffani. “I'm kind of the bridge,” Ciuffani said. “They're not looking at me serving in this capacity for a decade.”
William Grand of Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis has been loss prevention and ethics counsel to the 93-lawyer firm, based in Iselin, for 35 years, and became designated firm GC in the mid-2000s. There, too, an assistant general counsel has been chosen: litigation partner Alan Naar, who was selected within the past year.
That's partly because of the volume of work. Sometimes Grand's complex commercial litigation practice picks up and leaves less time for the GC duties. But it's also so that someone else learns the role.
And it appears there's a fair amount to learn. At one time, firms treated familiarity with ethics rules as each attorney's individual responsibility, but now it's treated as a firmwide effort, according to Grand. Just keeping abreast of ethics rules is itself loss prevention, he said. Grand said of any given lawyer at the firm: “He's making business decisions. He's making decisions for the benefit of the clients. But I want ethics to be right up there.”
Grand organizes internal seminars on the New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct and other topics. The substance of the issues is often technology-related, i.e.: “What will become the standard of care for wiring funds from our trust account? … Is it enough to follow the instructions in an email?” Also, when leaving and returning to the country, should lawyers leave behind firm devices in case customs agents attempt to seize a device containing client info? “Some of these things—there aren't clear answers yet,” Grand said.
Grand lets attorneys know he's always available, even while on vacation, and usually responds the same day, he said. Inquiries come almost every day.
“If people called me and it took me a week to get back to them, they'd stop calling,” Grand said. “It would be an afterthought.”
At 68-lawyer Newark-based law firm Genova Burns there is no designated GC, at least not nominally, but for Bottitta the position of ethics counsel is a full-time one. Bottitta, 69, a former president of the New Jersey state and Essex County bar associations who managed New Jersey Lawyer Services for a dozen years, joined Genova Burns in mid-2013 as of counsel. He assists with some litigation, ADR and estate matters, but has no billing requirement and no full practice, he said.
“That's the key to being ethics counsel—the availability,” Bottitta said. “That's why I don't know if you can do it on a part-time basis.”
In order to line up potential replacements, Bottitta has “taken a few people and kind of whispered in their ear,” he said. One way he's done that is organizing, with the help of employment law associate Allison Benz and others, seminars on social media and document metadata.
For the attorney who eventually replaces Bottitta as ethics counsel, the substantive issues are many, including changes to the RPCs. Another issue that's come up of late, according to Bottitta, is whether various arbitration rules permit multijurisdictional practice. In addition to keeping abreast of such issues, Bottitta is copied on every new file that's opened at the firm, and reviews the engagements for conflicts. A relationship between an existing client and anyone averse to the potential client's action, even if it's through a subcontractor, could preclude the engagement, though lawyers have gotten better at looking for those issues at the outset, Bottitta said.
On the rare occasion a new client engagement must be turned down, the ethics counsel is “literally taking money out of somebody's pocket,” Bottitta said.
“It can be an expensive proposition,” he added. “Sometimes you have to tell them 'no.'”
That's a difficult discussion to have, but the message from management is clear, he said: “You make the call.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElection Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In
6 minute readTroutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250