Fatal Bus vs. Pedestrian Accident Yields $5M Settlement in Bergen
A roundup of notable case results in New Jersey.
February 26, 2018 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
The family of a Fort Lee woman who was struck and killed by a bus while attempting to cross the street is to receive $5 million as compensation in a Bergen County suit, Kan v. Rainbow Transportation.
The family of Leyla Kan, the deceased woman, and American Alternative Insurance Co., the carrier for defendant Rainbow Transport of Bergenfield and its driver, Esperanza Jaramillo, agreed to the settlement on Feb. 9, said the family's attorney, Englewood solo Robert LInder.
Kan was struck and killed on Aug. 7, 2014, as she was walking across Broad Avenue at Fort Lee Road in Leonia, in a marked intersection, Linder said.
Kan was struck by the school bus and dragged 71 feet. She was pronounced dead at the scene, Linder said.
The victim's family filed a wrongful death and survivorship claim against Rainbow Transport and its driver in Bergen County Superior Court. The case had been managed by Superior Court Judge Rachel Harz, but had not yet been scheduled for trial. It settled during discovery.
American Alternative was represented by Danielle DeGeorgio, of Faust Goetz Schenker & Blee in Livingston. She did not return a call about the case.
Kan was the owner and operator of the Picnic Café, a restaurant in Palisades Park. Kan is survived by her husband, Oktay Kan; her son, Atilla Kan; and her grandson, Tristan Kan, Linder noted.
— Michael Booth
$1.3M Verdict in Monmouth Auto Case
Reid v. Radcliffe-Bivins: A Monmouth County jury awarded $1.3 million on Jan. 26 to a man who suffered severe back and neck injuries in a head-on crash. But the verdict far exceeds available coverage in the case, and the total recovery is $80,000.
Melvin Reid was a passenger in a vehicle driven by his son Marc in February 2014 when their vehicle collided with one driven by Jonathan Radcliffe-Bivins on Route 70 in Toms River.
Reid, then 68, developed herniated discs in his neck and back, but was not considered a candidate for surgery. His treatment included cervical facet blocks and lumbar epidural injections, said plaintiff lawyer Daniel Santarsiero of Jonathan Marshall's office in Red Bank.
Previously, Reid regularly worked on home remodeling projects, but following the accident, his chronic pain and inability to engage in his prior activities took a significant toll on his personality and relationships with family members, the suit claimed.
Radcliffe-Bivins was released from liability after tendering his $20,000 policy with GEICO, and Reid brought an under-insured motorist claim against his own policy with Allstate, which had $100,000 in coverage. He also gave notice of claim in connection with his son's under-insured motorist policy with New Jersey Manufacturers, which chose not to participate in the trial, according to Santasiero.
During a five-day trial before Judge Mara Zazzali-Hogan, Allstate asserted that Reid's spinal injury was caused by a pre-existing degenerative disc disease, Santarsiero said. Reid did not dispute that he had pre-existing degeneration in his spine, but indicated that prior to the crash, his spine did not force him to limit his activities.
The jury awarded $1.25 million to Reid and $50,000 to his wife, Mary Lynn, on a per quod claim. Allstate paid $80,000, representing the $100,000 coverage limit minus the contribution of Radcliffe-Bivins.
Santarsiero said he will now seek to recover from the under-insured motorist portion of Reid's son's policy with New Jersey Manufacturers, whose policy limit is unknown.
Sean Doherty of Pamela Hargrove's office in Wall, who represented Allstate at trial, did not return a call seeking comment.
— Charles Toutant
$350K Cumberland Verdict in Fall
Vega v. Family Dollar Stores Inc.: A Cumberland County jury awarded $350,533 to a woman who fell while shopping on Jan. 11.
According to counsel for the plaintiff, on Dec. 23, 2013, plaintiff Yolanda Vega, 57, was shopping with her daughter at a Family Dollar store in Vineland. She asserted that as she was walking at the end of an aisle, she slipped on a large area of clear liquid. She landed on her backside and claimed she injured her neck, shoulders and spine.
Vega sued Family Dollar Stores Inc., alleging negligence in maintaining the premises, creating a dangerous condition. The liquid that Vega had slipped on came from a bottle of cleaner which was found on the floor near the spill. Vega's counsel argued that the liquid had been on the floor for some time. Vega's counsel further faulted the store for being understaffed, particularly since it was the holiday season. There was only one employee in the store at the time, and that employee's duty was to be behind the register, instead of inspecting the store for potential dangerous conditions.
Vega was hospitalized and later presented to her primary care physician, who referred her to a chiropractor. Vega treated with chiropractic care and physical therapy. An orthopedic surgeon diagnosed herniations at C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7; bulging at lumbar discs L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1; and other injuries. She received epidural injections and at the time of trial continued to take pain medication and consult with her pain-management physician. Vega's orthopedic surgeon and pain-management specialist both causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident, and opined that they were permanent in nature.
Family Dollar asserted that it had no notice of the spill and that Vega was unable to establish how long the liquid had been on the floor or how it had gotten on the floor. Family Dollar's expert in orthopedic surgery, who examined Vega and reviewed her films, determined that her MRIs showed pre-existing, degenerative conditions, and that any accident-related injury would have long subsided.
The matter was tried for three days before Superior Court Judge James R. Swift. The jury found Family Dollar liable for Vega's accident and injuries. and awarded $300,000 in non-economic damages and $50,533 for past medical expenses.
Vega was represented by Jeremy M. Weitz of Spear, Greenfield, Richman & Weitz in Philadelphia. Family Dollar was represented by Matthew R. Harris of Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers in Cherry Hill,
Editor's note: This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— VerdictSearch Reports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMed Mal Claim for Injury Stemming From Epidural Nets $2.75 Million Settlement
3 minute readNJ Transit Bus Crash With Allegedly Parked Vehicle Nets $1.1 Million Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250