Pregnancies Prompt Bias Suit by Lawyer at Family Law Boutique
A lawyer has been accused in an Essex County discrimination suit of blurting out a profanity when she learned her associate was pregnant. But the defendant says she's being sued because she resisted allowing an attorney in her firm to work on a part-time basis.
February 27, 2018 at 05:44 PM
4 minute read
A lawyer has been accused in an Essex County discrimination suit of blurting out a profanity when she learned her associate was pregnant. But the defendant says she's being sued because she resisted allowing an attorney in her firm to work on a part-time basis.
Toni Belford Damiano replied, ”That's great, what the [expletive] am I going to do now?” when family law practitioner Nicole Casciola announced her first pregnancy in September 2010, according to the suit, which accuses Damiano of demonstrating pregnancy animus over the births of Casciola's three children.
Damiano, who is municipal court judge in Woodland Park, New Jersey, and heads an eight-lawyer family law firm in Little Falls, New Jersey, faces claims of gender discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation and failure to accommodate a disability in the suit, which was filed Jan. 10.
Kevin Barber, the attorney who represents Casciola, called it “remarkable” that pregnant women still face such mistreatment at work.
“Even female lawyers employed by other female lawyers can be victims of this kind of discrimination. The actions that Ms. Casciola alleges Ms. Damiano and her law firm took against her because of her pregnancies have no place in a professional work environment or in our society today,” said Barber, of Niedweske Barber Hager in Morristown, New Jersey.
According to the suit, during her first pregnancy, Casciola asked if another associate could be sent to her court appearances to faraway locations when winter weather left roads icy, but Damiano angrily rejected the request, saying Casciola should go out on disability leave if she could not make it to court appearances. But that response fails to acknowledge that attorneys at the firm frequently covered appearances for one another, the suit claims.
When Casciola was pregnant with her second child in 2016, she and Damiano again clashed over her coverage of court appearances that were far away. Casciola was concerned about being alone in inclement weather and far away from the hospital, according to the suit. Also during her second pregnancy, Casciola was warned by a partner at the firm, Steven Segalas, that she was going to be fired and should hire an attorney, the suit claims.
After Casciola's second child was born, Damiano made disparaging comments in the presence of co-workers, such as “please, whatever you do, don't tell me you are pregnant again,” according to the suit.
In May 2017, when Casciola learned she was pregnant with her third child, she withheld the news from Damiano. But on Sept. 5, 2017, she notified Damiano that she was pregnant and experiencing complications and sought accommodations. Two days later, Damiano called Casciola into her office and said her part-time position would be eliminated at the end of the year. Damiano also said at the meeting that Casciola's billable hours were insufficient, a charge Casciola denies.
Then, on Sept. 8, Damiano's son, R. Luke Damiano, the office manager, accused Casciola of lying about her billings, a claim she says she refuted.
On Sept. 18, Damiano told Casciola in a letter that she was welcome to continue with the firm if she was willing to work full time. On Oct. 12, Casciola responded in writing that she would not accept the full-time position and that she felt she was terminated. Casciola subsequently gave birth to her third child, and she remains on maternity leave.
Michael Epstein and April Gilmore of the Epstein Law Firm in Rochelle Park, New Jersey, represent Damiano and her firm. Epstein said Damiano has been highly accommodating to Casciola and other women attorneys at the firm when they are pregnant. But the firm is within its rights to require all of its attorneys to work full time, said Epstein. Casciola does not require an accommodation because she is no longer pregnant, he said.
“The allegation of discrimination, we submit, has no merit,” said Epstein.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBilling Rate Hikes 'Not Slowing Down,' With Pricing Surges Expected in 2024
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 2For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 3As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 4General Warrants and ESI
- 5GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250