Brady Cleared of Harboring Boyfriend as Hindering Counts Are Tossed
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed granted a motion by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to drop two counts of hindering apprehension against Carlia Brady Thursday, just as a jury was being selected in the 4-year-old case.
March 01, 2018 at 06:26 PM
4 minute read
Suspended Superior Court Judge Carlia Brady has been cleared of charges that she harbored her boyfriend as a fugitive after prosecutors dropped the last remaining counts against her.
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed granted a motion by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to drop two counts of hindering apprehension against Brady Thursday, just as a jury was being selected in the 4-year-old case. A charge of official misconduct against Brady was dropped in March 2016, and the Appellate Division affirmed that ruling in September 2017.
The charges were dropped in light of an Appellate Division ruling finding that Brady's ex-boyfriend, Jason Prontnicki, could not be compelled to testify at her trial. Prontnicki was the prosecution's only witness, said Brady's lawyer, Timothy Smith of Caruso Smith Picini in Fairfield.
Brady, a fledgling judge who was assigned to Middlesex County Superior Court in February 2013, was arrested by Woodbridge police in June 2013 for allegedly failing to turn in Prontnicki even though she knew he was wanted in connection with the robbery of an Old Bridge pharmacy. She was placed on suspension from her position after the arrest.
The Woodbridge Police Department and prosecutors claimed Brady failed to call police soon enough when he came to her home. The case was handled by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to prevent a conflict with prosecutors in Middlesex, where she was a judge.
“The victimization of Carlia Brady has ended,” Smith said. “She was raked over the coals because some rogue cops were out to get a judge. She was the victim of a false arrest, a false charge, a false indictment and a malicious prosecution.”
“The complaint alleged she committed hindering by virtue of not immediately calling police when she became aware of the whereabouts of her live-in boyfriend. That was the theory. However, that is not the law—there is no such obligation. So this case was, at all times, based on a flawed theory of prosecution and it was based on what the Woodbridge police wanted the law to be as opposed to what it was,” Smith said.
Appellate Division Judges Mitchel Ostrer and Jack Sabatino, ruling on Wednesday, reversed a trial court order compelling Prontnicki to testify about his interactions with Brady just before her arrest in June 2013. Prontnicki, who was convicted in connection with the pharmacy robbery, but has appealed, cited his privilege against incriminating himself. The appeals court said Prontnicki's right to avoid self-incrimination remains viable even after his conviction.
Brady was arrested in June 2013 and was suspended from the bench. She was confirmed and assigned to the Middlesex County Superior Court in February 2013, becoming the first New Jersey judge born in the Philippines. Before becoming a judge, she practiced with Stark & Stark in Lawrenceville.
A judiciary spokeswoman did not provide a response on Thursday to a question about whether Brady would be allowed to return to the bench.
“She deserves to be returned to the bench. She did nothing wrong, either criminally, ethically or morally. Her conduct was in conformance with the law and she should be returned,” Smith said.
Besides Smith, Brady was represented by Steve Kaflowitz and Wolodymyr Tyshchenko, also of Caruso Smith Picini.
The Somerset County Prosecutor's Office did not respond to a reporter's questions about the case on Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFirst-of-Its-Kind Parkinson’s Patch at Center of Fight Over FDA Approval of Generic Version
3 minute readA Year of Controversy: NJ Judges Face Disciplinary and Legal Issues With Mixed Results in 2024
4 minute readFormer McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
6 minute read2024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250