Brady Cleared of Harboring Boyfriend as Hindering Counts Are Tossed
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed granted a motion by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to drop two counts of hindering apprehension against Carlia Brady Thursday, just as a jury was being selected in the 4-year-old case.
March 01, 2018 at 06:26 PM
4 minute read
Suspended Superior Court Judge Carlia Brady has been cleared of charges that she harbored her boyfriend as a fugitive after prosecutors dropped the last remaining counts against her.
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed granted a motion by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to drop two counts of hindering apprehension against Brady Thursday, just as a jury was being selected in the 4-year-old case. A charge of official misconduct against Brady was dropped in March 2016, and the Appellate Division affirmed that ruling in September 2017.
The charges were dropped in light of an Appellate Division ruling finding that Brady's ex-boyfriend, Jason Prontnicki, could not be compelled to testify at her trial. Prontnicki was the prosecution's only witness, said Brady's lawyer, Timothy Smith of Caruso Smith Picini in Fairfield.
Brady, a fledgling judge who was assigned to Middlesex County Superior Court in February 2013, was arrested by Woodbridge police in June 2013 for allegedly failing to turn in Prontnicki even though she knew he was wanted in connection with the robbery of an Old Bridge pharmacy. She was placed on suspension from her position after the arrest.
The Woodbridge Police Department and prosecutors claimed Brady failed to call police soon enough when he came to her home. The case was handled by the Somerset County Prosecutor's Office to prevent a conflict with prosecutors in Middlesex, where she was a judge.
“The victimization of Carlia Brady has ended,” Smith said. “She was raked over the coals because some rogue cops were out to get a judge. She was the victim of a false arrest, a false charge, a false indictment and a malicious prosecution.”
“The complaint alleged she committed hindering by virtue of not immediately calling police when she became aware of the whereabouts of her live-in boyfriend. That was the theory. However, that is not the law—there is no such obligation. So this case was, at all times, based on a flawed theory of prosecution and it was based on what the Woodbridge police wanted the law to be as opposed to what it was,” Smith said.
Appellate Division Judges Mitchel Ostrer and Jack Sabatino, ruling on Wednesday, reversed a trial court order compelling Prontnicki to testify about his interactions with Brady just before her arrest in June 2013. Prontnicki, who was convicted in connection with the pharmacy robbery, but has appealed, cited his privilege against incriminating himself. The appeals court said Prontnicki's right to avoid self-incrimination remains viable even after his conviction.
Brady was arrested in June 2013 and was suspended from the bench. She was confirmed and assigned to the Middlesex County Superior Court in February 2013, becoming the first New Jersey judge born in the Philippines. Before becoming a judge, she practiced with Stark & Stark in Lawrenceville.
A judiciary spokeswoman did not provide a response on Thursday to a question about whether Brady would be allowed to return to the bench.
“She deserves to be returned to the bench. She did nothing wrong, either criminally, ethically or morally. Her conduct was in conformance with the law and she should be returned,” Smith said.
Besides Smith, Brady was represented by Steve Kaflowitz and Wolodymyr Tyshchenko, also of Caruso Smith Picini.
The Somerset County Prosecutor's Office did not respond to a reporter's questions about the case on Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Nonprofits Plead for Answers, Dem AGs Plan Suit to Block Trump Funding Freeze
3 minute readMenendez Asks US Judge for Bond Pending Appeal of Criminal Conviction
NJ Jury Awards $8M to Woman Injured by Employees Chasing Suspected Shoplifter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250