Gross Revenue Dips Slightly, PPP Shrinks for Partner-Replenished McElroy Deutsch
"It was a disappointing year because our productivity was up. The billable hours of the average lawyer was up. And the rates were up," managing partner Edward Deutsch said. "But I think everybody's got a problem with slow-paying clients."
March 07, 2018 at 12:04 PM
4 minute read
Fiscal year 2017 for McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter generated a gross revenue figure that the firm's leader characterized as “disappointing.”
Disappointing but not apparently disastrous: The $117.9 million revenue figure is a 0.8 percent decline, from $118.8 million in fiscal year 2016. That means gross revenue has been essentially flat since 2015, when it was $118.5 million, and is up only about 1.2 percent over a five-year period, from $116.5 million in fiscal year 2012, though the firm has consistently improved its revenue per lawyer over that span.
A second noticeable factor is a sizable jump in equity partner ranks: to 36 from 26, a 38.5 percent spike.
Within the firm, they're referred to as “senior partners,” but age isn't the determining factor in making an equity partner, according to Edward Deutsch, managing partner of the Morristown-based firm.
“Some of them are much younger people, they're just doing a great job and deserved to be recognized,” Deutsch said in an interview.
“We hadn't made any new senior partners in several years, and it was time. We were playing a little bit of catch-up,” he added, noting that the firm's partnership agreement mandates periodic review. “When you have good people and you want to keep them, you have to reward them.”
As for revenue, Deutsch said he expected better, but late 2017 didn't unfold as planned, with “several million dollars promised” from fee-owing clients, but “only part of it came in.”
“It was a disappointing year because our productivity was up. The billable hours of the average lawyer was up. And the rates were up,” he said. “But I think everybody's got a problem with slow-paying clients.”
Some insurance clients, of which the firm has many, are billed quarterly. If the firm sends a large quarterly bill that a client takes 30 days to pay, “you financed that for close to six months,” Deutsch said.
“The bigger problem is cases that you get into and they become much larger cases than anyone intended,” he added. “We had two or three of those this past year.”
For one Connecticut client, who Deutsch said is in the construction industry, though he declined to give a name, a multimillion-dollar settlement was reached but then fell apart, and the client's business failed. That means the final $800,000 in fees the firm is owed is up in the air while the parties await a court's ruling, he said.
Other metrics were steady. In attorney head count, there was a net decrease of two, to 247. Revenue per lawyer (RPL) was practically unchanged, down 0.2 percent, to $477,000 from $478,000.
Profit per equity partner was a different story. With a net gain of 10 in the equity partner ranks, PPP dropped 21 percent, to $863,000 from $1.09 million. Just as equity partner population increased, nonequity partner population predictably decreased—to 79 from 87, a 9.2 percent change.
Firms routinely report having a strictly merit-based compensation system with a handful of nonequity partners who earn more than some equity partners, and McElroy Deutsch fits in this category, according to Deutsch. With the partner ranks changed in 2017, compensation was spread differently, but the PPP figure tells little about what individual partners made, he said.
Insurance practitioners are expected to bill 1,900 hours per year; those in other practices, such as estates and other transactional disciplines, bill at higher rates and have lower benchmarks, Deutsch said.
But generally, “there's no formula,” Deutsch said. “Formulas have killed law firms.”
Deutsch noted that each of the firm's partners, equity and nonequity, get a vote.
In terms of practice areas, commercial litigation and insurance litigation performed well in 2017, while bankruptcy, including creditor- and debtor-side work, was quiet, even in the firm's bankruptcy practice in Delaware, a typically busy market, according to Deutsch.
He echoed what's become a common sentiment among firm leaders in New Jersey and elsewhere who wish to improve their financial metrics: Weeding out lower-margin work.
“We're just not going to take that work anymore,” though “we've kind of grandfathered [in] some of the long-term clients,” and doing a low-rate “favor” for a client who provides a lot of work to the firm is not uncommon, Deutsch said. “Regardless of volume, you have to look at, did we make any money?”
Deutsch said the firm also is examining expenses in all offices, but only so much can be done with that side of the ledger.
“You can't really manage by expenses,” he said. “You really have to manage by revenue.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElection Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In
6 minute readTroutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250