BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
An update on the goings-on in Trenton: Join us March 22 for this year's Town Hall program; plus a look at the status of the Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act.
March 19, 2018 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
Controversial aid in dying bill voted out of Assembly Judiciary Committee
The Assembly Judiciary Committee approved a bill that would allow a terminally ill adult patient to self-administer medication to end his or her life. The Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act—A-1504 (Burzichelli)/S-1072 (Scutari)—was first introduced in 2012 to create a mechanism for people to make end-of-life decisions legally and in consultation with a physician. The New Jersey State Bar Association supports the bill because of the safeguards put in place to ensure that these decisions are voluntary and to prevent abuse of the process.
“This is about revisiting a statute last looked at in 1978 that never took into account an individual's right to control their body and their circumstances,” said Burzichelli. “Like society, medicine, palliative care and hospice services have changed dramatically since then. While there are many choices available right now that may be right for certain people, there is one more choice, not currently available, that deserves an honest discussion.”
In order for the terminally ill patient to receive a prescription, the patient is required to make two oral requests and one written request to his or her attending physician for the medication. There is a 15-day waiting period between the initial oral request and the second request, and the initial request and the writing of the prescription. There must be a minimum of 48 hours between the written request and the writing of a prescription for the medication.
The physician must provide the patient with information regarding the risks, probable results, and alternatives to taking the medication; recommend treatment opportunities, palliative care, comfort care, hospice care, and pain control options; and refer the patient to a healthcare professional who is qualified to discuss those alternative care and treatment options. The patient may choose to participate in this consultation, but is not required to do so. The attending physician is also required to recommend that the patient notify his or her next of kin of the request, but medication may not be denied if the patient declines, or is unable to, provide this notification. Verification of the terminal illness is required by a consulting physician.
A standing-room-only crowd attended the hearing to testify on both sides of the controversial bill, which twice passed the Assembly but stalled in the Senate. In his testimony, Burzichelli pledged his commitment to move the bill through the Senate and onto the governor's desk. He pointed out that the legislation is not a “death with dignity” bill, and assured the committee that the legislation was not intended to permit people with disabilities to abuse the process to selectively end their lives. Opponents of the bill have charged that it is fraught with potential for abuse by people who would not qualify as terminally ill, and questioned the determination of terminal illness.
The bill is pending in the Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee.
NJSBA's Town Hall: What Would You Do? Register Now!
Join the NJSBA in Trenton for this year's Town Hall program, featuring lawmakers and legislative staffers as they talk candidly about how to effectively advocate for clients. Lobbyists will ask the tough questions and legislators and legislative staff will discuss the issues. The program then moves on to ethics. The program runs from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. on March 22 at the Masonic Temple in Trenton. For more information and to register, go to www.njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Letter From London: 5 Predictions for Big Law in 2025, Plus 5 More Risky Ones
- 2Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
- 3Jenner Brings Back Zachary Schauf from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel
- 4'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
- 5A Jury to Determine Whether Stairs Were Defectively Designed in Injury Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250