Tesla Faces Whistleblower Suit Over Sale of Repaired Cars as New
Tesla has vehemently denied the allegations in the complaint and contended that the plaintiff is not entitled to any recovery, the company said in its notice of removal.
March 23, 2018 at 05:57 PM
3 minute read
Tesla faces a whistleblower suit from a former employee who says the upscale electric car maker fired him for complaining about damaged vehicles that were fixed up and sold as new.
Adam Williams of Lumberton, New Jersey, filed the suit in Burlington County Superior Court in January, and a lawyer for Tesla removed it to federal court in Camden on Friday.
Tesla has vehemently denied the allegations in the complaint and contended that Williams is not entitled to any recovery, the company said in its notice of removal. However, the company concedes that the District Court's jurisdictional level of $75,000 in controversy has been met. Tesla said in its removal notice that Williams' salary at the time of dismissal was $120,000. If the case were to proceed to trial in one year, Williams' back pay would be $180,000, the company said.
Williams, who worked at the company's showroom in Springfield, New Jersey, brought his suit under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act. He asserts that the company made high-dollar, predelivery damage repairs to its vehicles without disclosure to buyers. Williams also reported to bosses that Tesla's practice of selling cars designated as “lemons” as used cars, demos or loaners was illegal or fraudulent.
Williams joined Tesla in 2011. He says he first made the reports about sale of damaged vehicles in late 2016 to his supervisor, Matt Farrell; vice president, Jerome Guillen, and Lenny Peake, an East Coast regional manager.
In early 2017, Williams was demoted from regional manager to service manager by Brian Applegate, a director for Tesla who is the boss of Farrell and Peake. Applegate told Williams he has a “brand” at Tesla and that there is no place for him in the company, the suit claims.
In July 2017, Williams was again demoted to the position of mobile manager, despite performing his job duties up to the expectations of the company, his suit claims. And in September 2017, Williams was terminated by Albert Grice, who told him the decision was made by Applegate, according to the suit. The stated reason for his termination was performance, but he was performing up to expectations, the suit claims.
Tesla spokeswoman Gina Antonini said in a statement about the case, “There's no merit to this lawsuit. Mr. Williams' description of how Tesla sells used or loaner vehicles is totally false and not how we do things at Tesla. It's also at odds with the fact that we rank highest in customer satisfaction of any car brand, with more owners saying they'd buy a Tesla again than any other manufacturer. Mr. Williams was terminated at Tesla for performance reasons, not for any other reason.”
Toni Telles of Eric Shore's office in Voorhees, New Jersey, who filed the suit, did not return a call. Alexa Nelson of Littler Mendelson in Philadelphia, who represents Tesla, also did not return a call, but a spokeswoman for the law firm, Jenae Journot, said the firm is unable to comment on client matters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readArbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250