Monmouth Jury Awards $2.5M For Crash With Car Stopped on Turnpike
In Coppola v. Yabon, a man involved in a crash while he was trying to avoid a car stopped on the New Jersey Turnpike was awarded $2.5 million on his under-insured…
April 02, 2018 at 09:00 AM
6 minute read
NJ Turnpike</>
In Coppola v. Yabon, a man involved in a crash while he was trying to avoid a car stopped on the New Jersey Turnpike was awarded $2.5 million on his under-insured motorist claim on March 9.
Shortly before 11 p.m. on Feb. 6, 2015, John Coppola was headed southbound from his Manhattan job to his Howell home, driving in the left lane, where a vehicle was stopped with no lights or flashers on. Coppola didn't see the stopped vehicle until he was about 30 feet away, and tried to swerve away but struck the vehicle, sending his vehicle to the center lane, where he was struck by another motorist, Dr. Bruce Aronwald, according to Coppola's counsel, Kathleen DiGiovanni of Levinson Axlerod in Howell.
Coppola, currently 47, sustained multiple fractures to his hip, requiring emergency surgery involving implantation of four plates and 13 screws, according to DiGiovanni. The suit claimed that Coppola will need a total hip replacement in the near future, and a revision surgery later in life, she said.
The suit named the operator of the vehicle stopped on the highway, Shaniya Yabon, and Aronwald. Yabon settled previously, and Coppola lodged an under-insured motorist claim against her carrier, Allstate. The UIM claim and claim against Aronwald went to trial.
At a four-day trial before Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Owen McCarthy, Allstate, standing in Yabon's shoes, contended that the accident was caused by Coppola's own negligence, as well as Aronwald's, according to DiGiovanni. The jury found Yabon 100 percent at fault for the accident, apportioned no liability to Coppola or Aronwald, and awarded $2.5 million for pain and suffering. The six-member jury was unanimous on everything but the finding of no fault against Coppola, which was a 5-1 vote, DiGiovanni noted.
Aronwald's counsel, Robert Borrelle of Schwab Haddix & Millman in Mount Laurel, confirmed the verdict.
Allstate's counsel, Fred Regenye of the Westfield office of Kenneth Lipstein, didn't return a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
|Livery Passenger Gets $1.5M
Callaghan v. Hub Group: A Franklin Township man will receive $1.5 million as compensation for injuries he sustained when the hired car in which he was traveling collided with a guardrail.
Plaintiff Steven Callaghan, now 51, agreed to the settlement on March 5 with Knight Insurance Group, the carrier for defendant Hub Group Inc. and its employee, Zabeer Shah, said Callaghan's attorney, Nicholas Leonardis.
The settlement came as the case was set to go to trial before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Jamie Happas, said Leonardis, of Edison's Stathis & Leonardis.
Callaghan was injured on Feb. 5, 2014. He was a passenger in a livery car owned by Hub Group and driven by Shah, according to Leonardis.
According to the lawsuit, there were snowy conditions at the time, and the roads were covered. Shah, Leonardis said, was driving on the New Jersey Turnpike at about 60 miles per hour. The lawsuit alleged that Callaghan repeatedly told Shah to slow down due to the dangerous road conditions.
Shah, Leonardis said, lost control of the car, which crashed into the guardrail.
As a result of the accident, Callaghan sustained a lumbar disc herniation that required a discectomy. He also sustained a left rotator cuff tear that required surgery, and a tear in the left knee miniscus that required surgery, Leonardis said.
Knight retained Asher Chancey of Goldberg Segalla in Philadelphia. He did not return a call seeking comment.
— Michael Booth
|$900K For Paper Shredder Injury
Urgovitch v. Shred Tech: A man whose right foot was partly amputated after he attempted to clear a jammed commercial paper shredder agreed to a $900,000 settlement in his Passaic County suit on Feb. 28.
Frank Urgovitch, an employee of a company that sent a paper shredding truck to clients' sites, was injured on May 22, 2015, when he was operating a shredding machine sold by Shred Tech of Cambridge, Ontario, Canada.
Urgovitch was inside the cargo area of his employer's truck, operating the shredder, when some large engineering drawings caused the machine's hopper to become jammed. Urgovitch climbed into the hopper—while the shredding device was operating—with the intention of standing on the jammed paper to free the clog. But his foot slipped and got pulled into the teeth of the shredder, said plaintiff attorney Andrew Rossetti of Rossetti & DeVoto in Cherry Hill. Urgovitch's co-worker heard his screams and hit an emergency shutoff button to stop the shredder before his entire leg was pulled in to the machine, Rossetti said.
Urgovitch and his co-worker later said they had climbed into the hopper many times in the past to clear it, and were told by the company to do so, although representatives of his employer disputed that, Rossetti said. After the machine that Urgovitch was using was manufactured, but before his injury, Shred-Tech began installing barrier guards that would prevent such accidents, Rossetti said. Shred-Tech also recalled some of its older machines for installation of barrier guards, but only for its three largest customers and not for the machine bought by Urgovitch's employer, according to Rossetti.
Urgovitch lost all five toes on his right foot in the accident, and surgeons amputated an additional half-inch portion of his foot beyond the toe line, said Rossetti.
Urgovitch is unable to continue at his job with the shredding company and is receiving disability benefits. He has a limp at times but is generally able to walk normally, Rossetti said.
Rossetti filed a products liability suit against Shred-Tech under a foreseeable misuse theory pursuant to the New Jersey Supreme Court's 1993 ruling in Jurado v. Western Gear Works. The parties held a mediation with former Appellate Division judge John Keefe Sr., with the Keefe Law Firm in Red Bank.
Shred-Tech was insured by Zurich and represented by John Goworek of Cascio & Capotorto in Parsippany, who did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250