Houlihan's Operator Agrees to $5M Settlement of Tip-Pooling Case With US Labor Dept.
An operator of Houlihan's restaurants in New Jersey and New York has agreed to pay $5 million in a consent judgment after the U.S. Department of Labor accused it of illegally pocketing a portion of servers' and bartenders' tips.
April 03, 2018 at 04:41 PM
5 minute read
Photo courtesy of shutterstock
An operator of Houlihan's restaurants in New Jersey and New York has agreed to pay $5 million in a consent judgment after the U.S. Department of Labor accused it of illegally pocketing a portion of servers' and bartenders' tips.
The Department of Labor had accused A.C.E. Restaurant Group of misappropriating employees' tips, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and paying tipped employees less than minimum wage, without fully complying with relevant regulations under the FLSA. The Labor Department also charged that A.C.E. allowed some employees to work at two or more of its locations for a total of more than 40 hours per week, without paying overtime to those employees.
The settlement calls for A.C.E. to pay $2.5 million in unpaid minimum wages and back wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages to employees. The settlement proceeds will be divided among roughly 1,400 current and former restaurant employees in varying amounts based on the level of back wages each is owed. The settlement period runs from February 2013 to May 2015. The settlement awaits the approval of U.S. District Judge Joseph Rodriguez.
“The U.S. Department of Labor will not hesitate to pursue appropriate legal measures, such as this consent judgment, so that employers commit to corrective action, restitution, and ongoing compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act,” Regional Solicitor of Labor Jeffrey Rogoff said in a statement.
Attorneys Daniel Hennefeld, James Wong, Molly Theobald, and Lindsey Rothfeder of the Labor Department's regional Office of the Solicitor in New York litigated the case for the government.
In addition to payment of the back wages and liquidated damages, the consent judgment requires the defendants to comply with the FLSA's minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and anti-retaliation provisions, and provide employees with a notice of their FLSA rights.
The New Jersey restaurants that are the subject of the Department of Labor suit are located in Bayonne, Brick, Bridgewater, Cherry Hill, Eatontown, Fairfield, Hasbrouck Heights, Holmdel, Lawrenceville, Woodbridge, New Brunswick, Paramus, Ramsey, Secaucus and Weehawken. The New York locations are in Farmingdale and Westbury.
The Labor Department suit was filed in September 2015.
The Department of Labor filed its suit in September 2015. A few months earlier, a separate suit was filed on behalf of 26 Houlihan's employees by attorney Deborah Mains, who made similar allegations. That case was filed as a collective action under the FLSA. But no more claimants were allowed to join that case after the government filed its case, said Douglas Weiner of Lipman & Plesur in Jericho, New York, who represented A.C.E. in both cases.
Rodriguez approved a settlement in the first case on March 8. The settlement in that case provided $93,500 to the plaintiffs, $33,000 in legal fees and $7,000 in costs. That case was filed as a collective action under the FLSA.
The Department of Labor suit said A.C.E. required servers and bartenders to contribute a percentage of their tips to a tip pool, and that pool was unlawfully used to pay custodians and kitchen workers. The suit also claimed A.C.E. was keeping a portion of the tip pool rather than fully distributing it.
The government said A.C.E. also required tipped employees to pool their earnings with expeditors, whose job is to assemble the various dishes and side orders, garnish for each party's order and ensur that hot and cold foods are brought to the party's table at the proper temperature, said Weiner.
The Department of Labor has previously made clear that tip pooling is permissible for front-of-the-house restaurant jobs such as host and busser, said Weiner. But whether it is permissible for the job of expediter, who operates in a middle ground between the front of the house and the kitchen, has been unclear, said Weiner. A.C.E. decided to end its practice of tip pooling for expediters in light of the Labor Department's action, he said.
Other restaurant operators won't find much guidance on tip-splitting in the A.C.E. case, said Weiner.
“Unwary employers may find themselves the subject of allegations by the Department of Labor that it has violated laws, even though they took steps to know what the requirements are and to comply with them. It's a tricky area that has gotcha traps,” he said.
A conservative approach to tip-sharing “is likely the safest way to distribute tips until this area has been fully clarified,” Weiner said. That would include any employee that spends more than 80 percent of his or her time on customer service, he said.
Mains, of Costello & Mains in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, who represented the plaintiffs in the first civil suit, did not return a call.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/52/06/81abc0aa43d3b124dba4cb604722/adobestock-435322344-767x633.jpg)
Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
3 minute read![Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus Starbucks Sues Ex-Executive to Recover $1M Signing Bonus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2024/03/Starbucks-Sign-767x633.jpg)
![After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/97/61/3629ec92467296216ec80b4820ca/schwartz-mattiacci-mann-iii-767x633.jpg)
After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute read![NJ Courts Have Hostile Work Environment, Ex-Employee Claims NJ Courts Have Hostile Work Environment, Ex-Employee Claims](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/f6/1d/7195396646419d7cd5518c7d2cae/essex-county-courthouse-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250