BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
NJSBA weighs in on entire controversy doctrine application to attorneys; NJSBA annual meeting to host legislators, key administration officials
April 30, 2018 at 07:05 AM
4 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
Entire Controversy Doctrine Applies to Attorneys as Plaintiffs, Says NJSBA
The New Jersey State Bar Association urged the Supreme Court to affirm the decision of the Appellate Division barring an action for legal malpractice based on the entire controversy doctrine. “
Attorneys who comply with the rules should be afforded the same protections as all other litigants who seek payment for monies owed utilizing the court system,” said the NJSBA in its amicus curiae submission in the matter of Dimitrakopoulous, et al. v. Borrus, et al., Docket No. 080357. The brief was written by NJSBA member Peter J. Gallagher, of Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, and Trustee Diana C. Manning, of Bressler Amery Ross.
The heart of the matter is a collection dispute between the parties for representation in a prior business litigation. The attorneys were relieved from that litigation by the plaintiff once the matter went into binding arbitration. The attorneys then pursued the plaintiff for fees related to their work on the business litigation and ultimately won a default judgment. The plaintiff alleged malpractice against the attorneys in the business litigation, but three years after the attorneys undertook efforts to collect the judgment.
Evangelos and Matilde Dimitrakopoulous argued in the Appellate Division that Borrus Goldin Foley Vignuolo Hyman & Stahl PC committed malpractice in the underlying action and was, therefore, not entitled to fees. Borrus argued that Dimitrakopoulous was barred from raising the issue by the entire controversy doctrine and the doctrine of waiver because they should have raised these claims as a defense or counterclaim in the collection action. The Appellate Division opined that when the business litigation concluded, or within a reasonable time after, the plaintiffs knew, or should have known, that their alleged damages were attributable to Borrus's professional negligence. Under the entire controversy doctrine, they were required to plead this as a counterclaim or defense in the collection matter.
In the appeal, the plaintiffs allege that when the collection matter was filed, the business litigation was still pending and, therefore, the plaintiffs did not have a full and fair opportunity to establish damages until the arbitration proceeding concluded. They further argue that the doctrine does not bar legal malpractice claims.
The association argues the plaintiffs' reliance on Olds v. Donnely, 150 N.J. 424 (1997), for the premise that the entire controversy doctrine does not require a client to bring a legal malpractice claim in the underlying action is inapplicable here “because plaintiff's lawsuit to recover its fees did not give rise to the malpractice claim.” The association points out that “the 'underlying case' contemplated by 'Olds' is the Plaintiffs' arbitration in which defendants represented them, not the fee claim.”
“The goals of the entire controversy doctrine are 'to promote judicial efficiency, assure fairness to all parties with a material interest in an action, and encourage the conclusive determination of a legal controversy,'” said the NJSBA.
The matter has not yet been scheduled for oral argument.
NJSBA Annual Meeting to Host Legislators, Key Administration Officials
This year's Annual Meeting and Convention welcomes a fresh perspective on a new administration, new policy initiatives and a new mindset in Trenton.
Attendees will hear from legislators on what's going on in Trenton at the “Inside Trenton” program, which will feature Senator Patrick Diegnan, Assemblyman Anthony M. Bucco, Assemblyman Louis Greenwald, Assemblyman John F. McKeon, and Assemblywoman Holly T. Schepisi. Senator Loretta Weinberg will discuss the new realities of the media in a post-Trump digital world in “You are What You Tweet.” Assemblywoman Joann Downey will address “Women in Politics and the Law.” Assemblyman Raj Mukherji will lend his expertise on “Cannabis in New Jersey: Laws, Legislation, Legal Practice and Economics.” Senator Bob Smith will discuss the new administration and changes anticipated at the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Assemblyman Jon Bramnick will discuss “Why People or Jurors Don't Like You: Interpersonal Skills Inside and Outside of the Courtroom.” Former Governor Jim McGreevey will address the Prisoner Reentry Program. And Chief Counsel Matthew Platkin will discuss voter suppression and the status of civil rights in 2018.
If you haven't registered, there's still time. Go to www.njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250